all 22 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 29 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Sigh... while "good news", I really hope this doesn't put the push to recycle lithium batteries on the back burner.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago

    The demand for lithium is still high enough that both are required, so it’s still good news regardless. But lithium batteries are still not super great due to the complex chemistry required.

    I’m more interested in the solid state, sodium-ion, or the zinc based depending on the application and whether they can work out some of the hurdles.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 26 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)
  • [–] [S] 25 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Or perhaps just good news for EV aficiandos everywhere. It seems to me that there's enough demand for all the lithium there is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago

    Its going to mean nothing unless its easy to seperate from the rest of the sediment.

  • source
  • USA really does have everything.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It could also be really really small. It could also be capable of feeling and thinking.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    So we can continue to use China/Bolivia's slave labor to get lithium instead?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Instead, let's underpay our own.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Sounds better than slave labor, no?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    We don't need lithium batteries for electric busses. Cities have had electric lines above streets to power electric busses for decades.

    Same for electric trains.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Want to replace fossil fuels?

    You have two options. Nuclear, or renewables.

    Renewables, however, generally don't produce consistent energy output. So, you need a way to store the surplus, and release it at night time.

    The most effective way of storing this energy, is currently pumped hydro. However, it has very specific geographical restrictions, and isn't an option in most cases.

    The other option, is lithium, until a better alternative is produced.

    As well, you need to replace fossil fuel usage for vehicles. The only current suitable alternative with an "OK" energy density, charge rate, and output capacity, is lithium based technologies. Typically uses Li-ion, or LiFePO4.

    Have a cell phone? Its powered with lithium batteries. All cell phones, are powered with lithium. Typically LiPO, or Li-ion.

    One day, this will change, but, until that day, lithium is needed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments