top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 89 points 2 years ago (7 children)

How in the hell was anti-intellectualism ever framed as cool?

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 57 points 2 years ago*

    Almost every movie or show I've watched since I was a kid featured a cool shoot from the hip maverick that didn't have time to do that nerd shit like making ethical safe choices or pondering over the legitimacy of some grand conspiracy. They never needed too. They all live in a world where grand conspiracy's existed.

    30 years later my generation grew up and have a lot of media stored right next to actual memories. So egg heads are evil spineless nerds that work for evil faceless organization. The real hero's are the guys that shoot first ask questions later.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 32 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Democracy. Everyone gets a vote, which leads people to think everyone's opinion is equal.

    Insecurity. People don't like feeling shit about themselves. It's easier to find excuses to hate someone you suspect is better than you, than accept the sad truth that you're less than them. We're all narcissists to a degree.

    A lot of people fluctuate between narcissism and self-loathing.

    Vanity. It's the devil's favourite sin.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago

    No democracy here.

    Democracy would mean that Al Gore and Hillary Clinton won their elections Just because more people voted for them.

    Republicans at every level of government get fewer votes yet hold more seats than Democrats.

    That's not democracy, That's something else.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago

    It’s so much easier to sound completely sure of yourself and like you’re obviously right when you don’t know all the details. It’s profoundly easy to preach from mount stupid. Detail takes nuance, it comes with changing perspectives. It’s difficult and uncomfortable and requires humility. None of that is cool.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    Ignorance is bliss. You can't be depressed about what you know you won't be able to or can't achieve if you don't know it. It's even better when you don't know that you don't know it.

    Paint chip?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 49 points 2 years ago (2 children)
  • [–] 34 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    When planes and distances get larger, hydrogen starts to make more and more sense. But I guess we won't get that far and planes will stay with biofuel and synfuel.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Hydrogen doesn't have best track record with regard to aviation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Electric airplanes are highly inefficient and not really good enough for commercial use.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    That’s unlikely to change for long distance flights.

    For short flights small electric planes are becoming viable already, and they will continue towards medium flights over time.

    But theres no serious concepts for a battery that could compete for long flights.

    That’s not to say that planes are doomed to be fossil dependent forever. But the likely solution will be a renewable high density fuel, possibly hydrogen or something easier to carry.

    It’ll be less efficient than batteries on a energy in to work out basis, but once the cost of carrying the weight is considered, that will always swing way in the favour of high density fuels regardless of battery efficiency (for long distance).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Personally I doubt electric flight will ever be viable, but that’s because we should be using trains for short flights …. Says me from an urban area

    Me who grew up rural near a small city says ….. what about connections from small city to an airport where I can go places?

    Me from when I worked at an investment management company and saw people with more money than they knew what to do with says ….. I just need a quick hop down the Cape to my beach house (never mind that I was never one of those people)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 45 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Yeah if it didn't cost me 3 or 4 times as much and take a week instead of 5 hours I would much rather take a train than fly home across the country

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Superconducting maglev trains can currently go about 70% the cruising speed of a 737, and could take you directly into a city center rather than an airport on the outskirts.

    Also, price isn't only a function of supply and demand. We also choose to subsidize fossil fuels with public funds, to make them artificially cheaper.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 39 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    The guy deleted his first tweet, but doubled down in his replies.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    https://mahb.stanford.edu/library-item/fossil-fuels-run/

    In figure 1 [4] we show the future energy reserves in billions of oil equivalent, Btoe, as a function of year. While we obliviously use up fossil fuels without taking stock of about what future reserves look like, we should take note of the endpoints shown here. These endpoints are dangerously close: Since our society is so dependent on fossil fuels, it therefore is extremely important for us to know when these fuels will run out according to [4]:

    Oil will end by 2052 – 30 years time

    Gas will end by 2060 – 40 years time

    Coal will last till 2090 – 70 years time

    However, according to BP [5], earth has 53 years of oil reserves left at current rate of consumption.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] 20 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago

    A lot of that extended when we discovered fracking. The industry will keep finding new and more expensive ways to locate and abuse natural oil and gas. I don’t think the world will “run out”, but it will certainly be too expensive for the majority of society. But that’s effectively the same.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    When I’m depressed, I think of it like …. We won’t run out, it just gets harder and more expensive to get, BUT we’ve already passed the point where we could recover in the event of civilization-wide catastrophe. We no longer have sufficient recoverable (as a less advanced society) energy sources to rebuild. If we fuck up now, that’s it for humanity

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] [S] 5 points 2 years ago

    I think framing it as fossil fuels will run out in our lifetime, or the lifetime of the next generation stresses the urgency of the situation, and makes it more relatable than saying “fossil fuels will run out by year 20XX”. It feels harder to ignore that way.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    Another thing to think of is what it will look like as people grab at those last remaining drops. We already see it in loosening of restrictions to allow fracking, and moving villages and farms to scrape coal out of weaker and weaker deposits. The costs (not paid) of gathering this fuel will only increase and it's already more than many are willing to tolerate, so the exact date of running out doesn't matter at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 8 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I hate to spoil your fun, but these dates are always some what wanky. When my grandpa was in school, they told him that there ist still enough cpal for 40 years. When my dad whas in school tey told him that there is still enough coal for 50 Years. My elementry school teacher told me the same. If ypu look it up today, you will find that the coal reserves last for another 80 to 150 years. Resources dont run out. They get more expensive as the reserves dwindel leading to the developement of alternatives.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
    [removed by mod]
  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Might I throw onto the table thorium power plants?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    You can throw up all over the place for all the difference it makes. Sure, there are benefits that sound great, but the reality is they don’t exist. I think India has the biggest investment in trying to figure it out, but it’s not there yet and may never be

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    What do you mean, thorium is far more common than uranium and require less processing to be used. Plus, it isn't always active like uranium, meaning it can be controlled a little better. It's worth looking into.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    That’s exactly what I mean. There are benefits that sound great. However there’s not a practical reactor based on that, yet.

    In some ways it seems like fusion. Every few years you see a flurry of headlines of how great it would be, and we’re only ten years away, but it hasn’t happened

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 2 points 2 years ago
    [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    good more of this everywhere all the time

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›