And Hannah Montana is the lie of it being accessible to new players.
Touch grass
post
replies:
this is certainty one of the takes of all time
replies:
Where funny?
2e is weirder and more sexualized
My man did not play the same PF1e that I did.
Also, both games achieve different things. Neither is "better', you just like 1e more, congrats.
replies:
It's.. more.. sexualized? What? Could you explain that part to me lmao
replies:
[deleted]
This is a fever dream take lol
Meanwhile those who really know see 3.5e V3
L take, oldheads stay mad and unbalanced
PF1 is 3X based and therefore unplayable garbage. PF2 is an actually functional game.
replies:
Take is too spicy. Would've worked better if you'd just kept to the fact that Billy Ray is plenty good if that's your style.
PF2e actually exists because of D&D 5e. 5e is a streamlined and (most people believe) improved version of 3.5, which is exactly what PF1e is under a different label. But to appeal to their rebellious hipster demographic the new PF had to be different and innovative. So you get a bunch of overly complex rules for options and the sake of just being like D&D but still totally not D&D. The result is a decent game that definitely isn't 5e because it intentionally trades off most of the streamlining that makes 5e more approachable for the sake of complexity and options.
Basically it's a bunch of pretentious hipster BS.
all 23 comments