welcome (discuss.tchncs.de)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/memes@lemmy.ml
 

all 43 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 73 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Jokes on you. I'm a Machinist and that feature on the drawing has an perpendicularity GD&T callout of +- 1deg. In spec is in spec. Ship it!!!

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 60 points 2 years ago* (3 children)

    As long as it's perfectly 89° it's fine. That's acute angle.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Engineers: Eh, close enough.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I didn't know 1° difference would be this noticeable. I am very disturbed.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago (3 children)
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago

    Guys it’s actually 90° but the photo is taken on an angle.

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    90° isn't any more perfect than 89°. Unless it was supposed to be 90°.

    So if you post this exact thing but include the right angle indicator, that would make the image work as intended.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago

    More concerned about why you wasted all those colors on this image when two was sufficient?

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago

    Ahhh, I love it when the 89 degree angles are perfectly 89 degrees.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago

    I’ll see you in hell

  • source
  • [+] 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
    [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    You should have put the little square thing in the corner to indicate a right angle!

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    It's still perfect since you can just take 32040 of these (= 89*360, ggt is 1 since 89 is prime) and then you will have a full circle. A real shame it would have been when you would have took an irrational amount of degrees since then this calculation would not be possible. There could only be an approximation that makes it impossible in reality to decide if it is right or not but mathematically speaken it would be impossible.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    I can't believe you've done this

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    That's not right.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    I prefer the 91° version

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago*

    After reading the title I internally thought: "fuck!"

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago*

    You evil son of a witch.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    You monster.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    Not a whole circle? BASTARD!

  • source
  • [+] 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
    [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    Don't let perfect be the enemy of good.

  • source