all 21 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 24 points 3 years ago (5 children)

How do people in the u.s get tribe status when they're like 1/60th native, and I'm 57% and my government says that's not enough?

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    It's handled by individual tribal governments. Some are very strict about who they let in, others are much more liberal about it. Basically it isn't our federal government that makes that determination.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago

    Just below you somebody posted that Barker was of 1/8 Native heritage.
    Yet he grew up on a reservation, and even strict tribal elders should (and probably did) take into consideration Barker's positive accomplishments for society in general, such as his campaign of awareness to spay/neuter pets to help keep the population under control humanely, and he was never afraid of using his microphone and airtime to remind his large audience every day, for decades.

    What I'm saying is, even if 1/8 wasn't technically enough, he could have made it in just like accomplished artists often receive honorary PhDs from prestigious Universities, even when they did not have (or finish) their formal education when younger.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    57% of which tribe? With more than half, I would expect you to have a fairly strong upbringing in the tribe with various customs and your parents likely know how to get you enrolled.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Not always that simple. My father has tried for years but gets stonewalled because of who his father was, my grandfather was disowned for marrying a white woman rather than leave her a single mother. In the end I think being cut off like that is what killed my grandfather really.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    Some tribes have been in legal battles over the past few decades because they're trying to disenroll people no matter how "native" they are. IIRC at least one tribe was limiting membership to only the descendants of the families that signed a specific treaty and then only if they had the paperwork to back it up. Which, if you know anything about the history of natives in this country, is really fucked up to require.

    Not the one I remember but here's an example of a tribe disenrolling people regardless of their "blood quantum":

    https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/politics/united-nations-watchdogs-raise-concerns-about-nooksack-evictions-again/

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    In the US, it depends on the tribe and they decide how much you need. Some are stricter than others. Canada and the US have been competing for worst treatment of first nations for a long time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Explain to me how you're 57%.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    73 of his 128 great great great great great grandparents were native Americans.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago*

    Realistically, they probably got that number from 23andMe or similar.

    Mine is 2.6% for Indigenous American, which is well within margin of error of what I heard from my family. (Note that those tests actually have very wide error bars anyway)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Wishing him a blessed journey to the land of souls.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 years ago* (3 children)

    Are you from the Rapid City area or is your username a coincidence? Always trips me out when I come across anyone from SoDak.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
    [removed by mod]
  • source