Researchers found low concentrations of so-called forever chemicals in various "eco-friendly" straws, raising doubts about whether they're an appropriate alternative.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 190 points 2 years ago (7 children)

Disposable products are gonna have problems to keep them cheap. The solution to straws is non-dispossble straws, always was.

Also this is still a silly topic, straws won't save the planet.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 89 points 2 years ago (29 children)

    Or stop using straws all together. Cups/lids can be made differently, so they are more like a sippy cup. You don’t NEED straws. Humans are totally capable of drinking directly from a cup, even without a special lid.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 33 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Single use bendy straws were literally invented to help keep bedbound and other disabled people alive.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    To be fair, drinks with ice in them are still miles easier to drink with a straw.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Straws are an accessibility need for some humans, not everyone is actually physically capable of drinking directly from a cup.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (25 replies)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 59 points 2 years ago (12 children)

    Strongly recommend hay straws (like, made of "straw").

    They're better than paper in that they don't sog up. They're inconsistent in size but that has never bothered me. A little flimsy, but I stir iced drinks with them all the time.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 2 years ago (5 children)
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago

    I do that too. There are plenty of subthreads going arguing straw-use is an accessibility issue, but in my case, I just want them for specific drinks -- mostly cocktails.

    The head on a Ramos Gin Fizz practically requires a straw to enjoy. Especially as someone with a mustache.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (10 replies)
    [–] 54 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    No comment on the level of PFAS aside from

    though the levels were low

    This is just feeding the outrage machine to get clicks. If it was a story they'd be citing concentration guidelines and telling you what concentrations were found in the products. It's not a story, it's rage bait.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    I agree 99%. The 1% left is that, honestly, it is shitty that they contain any kind of PFAS to begin with. If PFAS in any kind of concentration are part of the production process, then it just isn't sustainable in the long run.

    But the question is why do we need straws at all. I doubt that back in 1970 anyone would drink a latte macchiato with a straw. I found it strange just 15 years ago. If you fancy straws, you can get one high quality reusable one (steel, bamboo whatever) and carry it with you - I find this proposition much less offensive then expecting me to always carry a huge reusable cup with me. And for the most part you can consume drinks without a straw.

    Now, there is people who have disabilities that require them to use a straw. For them, have some in store as a vendor, and hand them out if requested.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 39 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Once in a restaurant I got some longe macaroni pasta as a straw and I still think this was genius.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 26 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    If I'm not mistaken, manufacturing facilities spray PFAS agents on various conveyor parts to prevent pulp from sticking to them and therefore require stoppage and cleaning. In other words, PFAS reduce the time and money spent on cleaning manufacturing equipment. Congratulations shareholders!

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago

    I'm glad someone is thinking of the shareholders. It's about time we focus on them and not such pesky abstractions like "the environment" or "the future"

    /s

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 23 points 2 years ago* (5 children)

    We have a couple metal straws and washable plastic ones. The metal ones probably have lead and the plastic ones are made of baby kittens.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [+] 18 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 18 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Drink directly from the glass.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 17 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    PFAS is everywhere at this point. Unfortunately they're reeeeeally good at what they're designed for and they're cheap. We'll need viable alternatives so they can be phased out. I think they should be banned from products that don't really need them like dental floss and hopefully we come up with an enzyme or something that can cheaply break it down in the environment.

    Side note, there has been at least one study that shows that donating blood regularly can reduce the amount of PFAS in your blood. This doesn't solve the problem of the stuff being everywhere but it's good to know you can remove it from your body over time.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 16 points 2 years ago*

    “All the straw manufacturers should take warning and say, ‘Hey, do we use this stuff?’ Because at the moment, they’re not even asking that question,”
    That is kind of concerning!

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    I don’t fuck with ANY straw that ain’t metal

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] [B] 12 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Scientists in Belgium recently tested dozens of straws from supermarkets, retail stores and fast-food restaurants in the country, and found that the majority contained PFAS — a family of synthetic chemicals used in the manufacture of consumer products because they can resist stains, grease and water.

    Thimo Groffen, an author of the new study and environmental scientist at the University of Antwerp, said it’s not clear whether the manufacturers of the straws he analyzed are intentionally adding PFAS as a waterproof coating.

    Graham Peaslee, who studies PFAS at the University of Notre Dame and was not involved in the new research, said it's possible manufacturers aren't testing for the chemicals in their own products.

    Keith Vorst, director of the Polymer and Food Protection Consortium at Iowa State University, said some of the straws in the study exceeded the proposed EPA concentrations for water.

    Various states, including California, Colorado, New York and Oregon, have banned plastic straws from food establishments in the last five years, and chains like Starbucks have phased them out.

    The main reason is that the straws generally can't be recycled, so they wind up in landfills, get burned in incinerators or become litter that contaminates oceans, rivers, lakes and streams.


    The original article contains 958 words, the summary contains 203 words. Saved 79%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    sigh We can’t do anything right, can we?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    This bot is terrible and I wish it would be banned. It's basically just randomly selects snippets and it leaves out very important details.

    The actual article says that the concentrations are very low and they don't even know if the manufacturer is intentionally putting them there or if they're finding their way in from other sources during manufacture. Also says the bamboo straws may have been grown in soil containing PFAS.

    They even found PFAS on most of the glass straws.

    It's concerning sure but the levels are so low that straws are the least of our concern when it comes to PFAS exposure.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    It's important to keep in mind that 75% of plastic straws also contain PFAS.

    The truth is, the PFAS stuff is independent of the main material of the straw* (yeah there's an asterisk, sec on that). It just so happens that PFAS are really good when we need to have a material not stick to food stuff too well and become unhygienic during its intended use time.

    *: Straws from glass and metal are an exception because those materials naturally do not bind well to grease, liquids and stains. They don't need an extra PFAS coating. But plastic, paper, bamboo, they virtually all do.

    That is to say, I would split the problem: We got the main material part done now, we're no longer using plastic for it. Now to get the coating done and use something that degrades very quickly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›