all 16 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 5 points 3 years ago (1 child)

Looks like an alternative to Send

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 3 years ago
    [–] 1 point 3 years ago (2 children)

    Is this different than hosting an ftp server?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago*

    But that's not cool. Looks like you also can't use your built-in system for managing the daemon/service and you have to install node.js.

    Can't deploy the latest micro service you found on github without some docker bullshit.

    With that said. I'm not shitting on the project itself - it looks great and I'm sure it serves a purpose.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (4 children)

    Is this a good option for someone like me that wants to host simple files for friends to download? I have my own domain and subdomains set up already.

    If this isn't a good option, can someone recommend me one? I'm looking for something simple to send files to people without a requirement for login info. Preferably something on docker.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    may not meet your requirements but have you taken a look at https://wormhole.app ?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Looks interesting but I'd prefer to self host it. I tried Nextcloud and had nothing but problems so I'm on the lookout for something simpler.

    Very generous with the 10 GB limit though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    Fair point, but do note that https://wormhole.app is just a web-client for the wormhole protocol. There's a reference implementation and there's - personally - a much better go-based implementation (wormhole-william) that also has a few clients built using its API:

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments