Some of them yes, the real shitty version of this is the 65mph divided highway where you can reel they just plopped a highway down in a rural area crossing over a bunch of country roads so instead of spending a shit load of money on overpasses you get the pleasure of merging directly into a actual highway. I've never actually had a problem at one of those because they're always in the middle of nowhere but you really get to test your cars acceleration when you find one.

Am American, the intersection design itself didn't register to me at all. They're like this pretty often yeah

I live in Tennessee.. the scenario in the old is so common I saw it 4 times yesterday. It's in every town, city, metro area here. There is no planning, no thought to motorists... They only apply a light once public outcry gets to the point where city officials can't ignore it any longer.

The town my wife is from has an intersection like above. It killed ~30 people over the years before a traffic light was installed.

That's it's very much normal.

When I was teaching my older son to drive, I took him through it. My recommendation: "Never turn left at it. Turn right and find a safer way to go the other way."

When he got to the interchange the guy in front of him tried to turn left and got hit immediately.

Yes, classic stroad design. Although I'm seeing it more often where it's not possible to make a left turn from the sidestreet.

Lots of American roads are like this. Generally you are better off making a right turn and then a U turn at a traffic light. I don’t bother turning left at an intersection like this unless there is no traffic.

Yes, and the only safe (and often time-saving) answer is to just turn right and then make U-turn later. Fortunately we have "right on red" as a legal maneuver here, so that softens the blow a bit. And yes, a civilized response to this nonsense would be a roundabout but we're mostly allergic to those (they are gaining traction in places though).

Often, these intersections rely on traffic lights to be navigable during anything resembling normal traffic. Without it, it's also kind of miserable for everyone waiting for oncoming traffic to clear in order to turn.

The only time I've witnessed this "wave someone out" technique as a good thing was where two-lane road traffic was too dense for local traffic to join. But that's a regional thing in the US (around Massachusetts by my reckoning). At the same time I've also seen folks there blindly apply that grace to situations where it does not belong, like highway on-ramps.

Also, while we're talking about safety, don't forget the 45mph delta between the stopped lane turning left and the traffic whizzing by mere inches from the stopped cars. Some places have a wide raised curb between these two lanes, but most do not.

these are everywhere and I've never seen one without a traffic light

People don't want nice, they want consistent.

-Jim Davis.

If he didn't see a bright red double decker bus, and he was behaving irresponsibly contrary to traffic patterns, he needs to have his driving privileges revoked.

Don't ride in bike lanes. They're usually death traps. Ride in the road where you can be seen. Follow the rules of the rode like any other vehicles

Dude please no, no more traffic light stop please

The amount of traffic light in my city is giving me ptsd

If they aren't going fast enough by the time they need to enter, they yield, not you cut across the stripes, nearly hit the impact attenuator, and run the car behind you into the next lane.

For what it’s worth, I agree with you. Safe driving is about being predictable. But defensive driving is about predicting what others are likely to do. And oftentimes, the answer to “what is this driver near me about to do” is “attempt negligent vehicular manslaughter.”

The correct answer is right, right, right - shit I'm back where I started