It's almost like a 100 page website TOS is meaningless.
post
The crux of it is
'If X owned the data, it could perhaps argue it has exclusive rights to control the data, but then it wouldn't have safe harbor.' if you own it you don't get section 230 protection.
This judge is also the one who stomped Oracle, in Oracle vs Google
replies:
As if a judge’s ruling ever mattered to musk
The cunt
Technically it is a "Judge says" post, but they still made it look like one of the old "Elon says" posts
replies:
Musk gotta cut back on that weed, or whatever he is smoking
replies:
Haha
all 13 comments