Genuine response, I'm not trying to argue or be feisty, I'm honestly curious:

I was raised with Zionist views and so my background and knowledge leans very pro-Israelie Jews. I'm hearing your words and when I then follow the last sentence with "so then where do the Israelie Jews go who are being claimed to take the homes of the Palestinians?" I'm brought to a drop in the path as my knowledge says that the homes they're in (not literally but same location) are their original homes. So, the question is: if we give Palestinians their homes back in Jerusalem and throughout Israel, where do those now displaced people go? Russia, Germany, Poland, etc? Those aren't their original homes either, they were displaced to there earlier and then had to flee from there eventually as well.

I would really appreciate a continuation of your reasoning or solution-ing - not as a challenge but to understand what happens after the Palestinians get what they need/want. The immediate answer displaces Israelie Jews, yet again, and it's frustrating as no one comes out and says that straight up. I think that's where a lot of the frustration in conversations comes from as the silence on that followed question leads to it being perceived as anti-semetic rhetoric eventually being answered as "fuck them - they're from nowhere and have no claim or right to any land" which eventually leads to the jump of "they're not worth anyone's time" which leads to worse.

Please note: I'm not inviting name calling or rude comments, I'm purely looking for a civil discussion to broaden my views and am open to alternative viewpoints from my own.

Having skimmed through the article mediafactcheckbias linked, it's kinda weird. At first glance it seems like it's raising legitimate concern, but it never specifies what.

It sounds like it's making a case that modified Bt toxins could cause unexpected problems in the ecosystem or for other crops on the long run by targeting more insect species than what it's designed to, a seemingly valid concern, but never actually reaches any conclusion, instead it uses handwaves like "unexpected toxicological properties " and "protecting public health and the environment" which make it look like they want you to think GMO are poisonous to people without actually saying it.