Lyft and Uber threatened to stop doing business in Minneapolis after the city council adopted a new rule Thursday that would set a minimum wage for rideshare drivers.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 117 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] 78 points 2 years ago

Further proof that if they could pay you less (or nothing), they happily would.

  • source
  • [–] 66 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Oh no. People might have to use regular taxis.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Or maybe just take a walk, use public transit, ride a bike, or use some other sort of !micromobility!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 60 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Good! Providing a cheap service at the cost of the staff doing the work is not acceptable.

    This is all just grandstanding anyway. They may leave, but likely they will just increase their rates.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago

    Exactly. I envision them threatening to leave, but ultimately not taking the revue hit by raising prices for the end users.

    I don't agree with profits over everything. I anticipate the public narrative blaming the drivers or politicians for them exiting the market, but in my opinion its their own corporate greed thats pushing them out. This is unfair and people shouldn't be vilified for standing up for workers rights.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 47 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    GTFO of Minneapolis if you can't pay your employees you don't deserve to do business here

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 2 years ago

    “Allow us to exploit the labor or we will leave the market”

    Same excuse since the dawn of slavery

  • source
  • [–] 31 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Ok bye! Nobody needs overpriced services that underpay all employees.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 2 years ago*

    Good. If business plan relies on exploiting workers, then it's a garbage business plan & deserves to fail.

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Call their bluff, they won't leave.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago

    They literally won't. They'll set their rates at "profitable" numbers and leave their computers on, just like everywhere else.

    But if the apparatus of the people (government) backs down then it'll be another total failure of government.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Okay bye bye. It’s not like they suddenly take all the drivers and their cars with them. Are they forgetting what business they are in? All they do is match drivers with passengers. Some other scrappy startup can easily fill that gap when they leave. Uber became only big because of first mover advantage and cut throat capitalism. Their tech is not groundbreaking.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago

    If every business in Ohio left that cried about some laws there wouldn't be any left

    They never pass up profit, even if it's less

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago

    don't threaten me with a good time

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago

    Conveniently, biking will be a good alternative again once the bike lane isn't full of illegally parked rideshare cars.

    (Not from MN but Ubers are a plague for safe city biking where I am)

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Considering they are not really any cheaper than taxis, no biggie.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    When scummy companies like that are really pissed off about a new policy, that policy is exactly the right thing to do.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    Good fucking riddance.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    Ha anything to avoid responsibility

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    Oh no, they'll have to pay their employees half the cost of living...

    ... Anyways

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    And then was born a 3rd competitor.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    Oh no...anyway

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    While I think this should pass, don't hold your breath. Mayor Frey will probably veto it. He's a very moderate, business friendly Democrat and our governor also vetoed a similar bill from the state legislature earlier this year. Right or wrong, they are concerned that any disruption of Uber/Lyft services would be extremely detrimental to people who depend on them. Public transportation in MN is really bad and this is one of the major ways people get around.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    Right or wrong, they are concerned that any disruption of Uber/Lyft services would be extremely detrimental to people who depend on them. Public transportation in MN is really bad and this is one of the major ways people get around.

    Having come from Iowa, the twin cities public transit is more than adequate for most commuters, and I strongly disagree with it being "really bad". I'm honestly aghast at the suggestion that people might use Uber of Lyft with enough regularity to impact day-to-day commuting. My wife elects to use the public buses into downtown from the suburbs out of convenience, even though her work provides downtown parking if she wanted it. Not saying it'll have NO impact, but frankly I don't think it'll have much of one.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago
    load more comments
    view more: next ›