top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 82 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The bridge is basically valueless compared to everything else about the ship and cargo plus the lawsuits from various contract breaches and other damages. Port shutdowns, environmental cleanup, insurance losses. $100m is a rounding error.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It's cost is both material and in the business of links from one side to the other. It's almost certainly worth multi billions at this point.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago

    And not just the business from one side of the land to the other, but also from the port to… everywhere out in the ocean. With the old bridge remnants blocking ships, that’s a LOT of lost business…

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 50 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Wow, I hadn't heard of this. They suspect that there are still people in the water that need to be rescued 😨

    https://www.fox5dc.com/news/francis-scott-key-bridge-baltimore-collapse

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 98 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Think it's probably more appropriate to say recover instead of rescue by this point. Unfortunately the Atlantic is pretty cold this time of year.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] [S] 34 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 29 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    So they'd free fall for ~3.4 seconds and hit water at around 75mph. That part could be survivable depending on angle of impact and safety features of the car. Assuming they survive impact, getting out in the dark with cold murky water coming in car and surviving the hypothermia as well and odds are slim to none.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • [–] 46 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It doesn't matter what the bridge is worth, the owners are only liable up to the value of the ship. They're protected by US and International law. The owners will be filing to limit their liability soon if they haven't done so already.

    https://www.britannica.com/topic/maritime-law/Limitation-of-liability

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 2 years ago (10 children)

    Interesting.

    This formula means, generally speaking, that the shipowner is entitled to limit his liability for the negligence of the master or crew, but not for his own personal negligence or that of his managerial personnel.

    Does this mean, if the captain fucks up their liability is limited, but if the accident is caused due to systematic poor maintenance maybe not?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago

    [IANAL]To a degree yes, this is why they love to find human error, it gets them covered by their insurance and limits the liability. Systemic issues that can be proven to come from the office would open them up. This is all before we get into shell companies and vessel charters .

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (9 replies)
  • [–] 33 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    They were on the phone with bankruptcy lawyers before dawn. That is the ones that didn't just disappear into hiding.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 21 points 2 years ago (10 children)

    Can you get insurance for a ship?

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Yes, there's rather shady business surrounding ship insurance, actually.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 18 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Estimates I could find said $60-$120 million

    I assume wrongful debt suits are gonna eclipse that tho

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    They'll declare bankruptcy before they fish the victims out of the water

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›