all 28 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 86 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Relic Castle,
is the site name that got DMCAd by Nintendont.

Saves you from opening the article.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 79 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Nintendo is on their way of becoming one of the worst companies of the year for the fans. Fucking hell...

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 80 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    This is not even remotely new for Nintendo, and is exactly how they have always reacted to fan games 🤷‍♂️

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 2 years ago*

    I saw a docu i think about smash bros. from nintendo, very cool docu serie btw, and the guys that organized the first tournaments got a letter or something that they where not allowed to organize such tournaments (mind you just fans playing the game in a bigger room nothing more) because, and here it comes, the game should not be played like that! Wtf.

    (Ah yes The Smash Brothers 2013)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    That doesn't make it any less vile.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    Nintendo has kind of always sucked as far as passionate fans are concerned. Their products are some of the best out there, sure, but they are ruthless.

    Playing devil's advocate, they're just protecting their IP. Problem is they can't spend resources or time figuring out who is or is not profiting from their work, so they just stamp out all the bugs in the house that get big enough to be noticed. I guess, I really don't know.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 36 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Stop supporting Nintendo. Boycott them.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 18 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    It's the highest grossing media franchise of all time, what sort of question is this?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Thank God it wasn't PokeMMO. I feel like they don't have long, though...

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I'm confused as to how that one wasn't shut down years ago, but others like this have been.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    They are very clever in how they handle Nintendo IP. Firstly, you must bring your own legitimate copies of the necessary titles:

    Fire red Black/white Heartgold/soulsilver Emerald Platinum

    Then they don't sell any Nintendo IP. Anything that is sold is either loosely based off Nintendo IP, or custom in-house design.

    Granted, I'm still surprised it's not been taken down somehow, but I'm over 1k hours into the game and I'm loving it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I've not really thought about it before, but how does a dmca takedown work? Is it just the company telling the hosting to get rid of it and they comply? What is to keep someone from self hosting or hosting somewhere hard to do anything about?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago*

    Once the alleged infringing content is removed, the infringing party has the option to file a Counter Claim in response, stating under penalty of perjury that the DMCA Notice is false. The OSP/ISP must wait 10-14 days after receiving a valid DMCA Counter Claim before reactivating or allowing access to the claimed infringing content. The claimant who filed the DMCA Takedown Notice must then file a court order against the infringing site owner and the OSP/ISP if they wish to keep the infringing content offline.

    Self-hosters are also subject to DMCA. Failure to comply runs the risk of being sued.

  • source
  • parent