The geneticist Jim Wilson, at the University of Edinburgh, was shocked by the frequency he found in the U.K. Biobank, an anonymized research database: One in 7,000 people, according to his unpublished analysis, was born to parents who were first-degree relatives—a brother and a sister or a parent and a child. “That’s way, way more than I think many people would ever imagine,” he told me. And this number is just a floor: It reflects only the cases that resulted in pregnancy, that did not end in miscarriage or abortion, and that led to the birth of a child who grew into an adult who volunteered for a research study.

Most of the people affected may never know about their parentage, but these days, many are stumbling into the truth after AncestryDNA and 23andMe tests.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 158 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Love a news article that let's you read down a while before cutting you off to reveal its a pay to view site.

Fuck those sites.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 48 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Firefox reader mode just grabs the text and images and let's me read the whole article on most of these sites.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Archive.ph

    Unlock anything. I’ve been using it exclusively since 10ft doesn’t always work

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It is the Atlantic to be fair so you might not be missing much. This from a magazine that endorsed the Shakespeare conspiracy repeatedly.

    If you can lie about one thing, you can lie about two....

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 62 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    One in 7,000 people, according to his unpublished analysis, was born to parents who were first-degree relatives—a brother and a sister or a parent and a child. “That’s way, way more than I think many people would ever imagine,”

    Now I'm not walking around thinking I'm living in a porn movie, but a rate of 0.014% is not what I would call shocking.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago (15 children)

    And this number is just a floor: It reflects only the cases that resulted in pregnancy, that did not end in miscarriage or abortion, and that led to the birth of a child who grew into an adult who volunteered for a research study.

    Either way, what number of parent raping and impregnating their child or sibling raping and impregnating their sibling would be shocking to you? Because to most people it's probably "anything that isn't zero".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    It's shocking to you that rape exists? Clearly its a bad thing and shouldn't happen, and it's upsetting, but I would disagree that most people would be shocked if you told them "more than zero rapes happened this year".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago* (3 children)

    While I agree with you in principle, I actually do think that 1/7k is unexpectedly high. If 1/10k people had an incestuous relationship, that would be low enough that I wouldn't find it surprising. This study, if we take it to be cross-sectional, implies that the rate of incidence is much higher, at least on the order of 1/1k, possibly something around 1%. I don't know the frequency that people of incestuous individuals have a child as a result, but the idea of it being higher than 1/7 strikes me as unlikely. Of course, multiple children can result from a pairing, so that has the potential to sway the numbers, but I'd hope that incestuous individuals are less likely to desire children from the relationship, and as a result would take a pregnancy as a sign to stop.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (14 replies)
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago*

    And this number is just a floor: It reflects only the cases that resulted in pregnancy, that did not end in miscarriage or abortion, and that led to the birth of a child who grew into an adult who volunteered for a research study.

    Meaning that this could be an indication of a wider incest....problem?......trend?.....idk....

    Edit: it was literally the next sentence....

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 24 points 2 years ago

    Given the number of blathering idiots there are, I'm kinda surprised inbreeding isn't even more common.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago (16 children)

    I’ve been thinking it’s pretty common for a while, just because of how common a version of it with plausible deniability for the downsides (step siblings, etc.) is in porn. I know people say it’s just to appeal to people who really like it and the rest can just mute, but that’s very unconvincing. I always have porn muted, because the sounds don’t do much for me and just about every person I talk to about this (not a lot, so grain of salt) is surprised that anyone would mute as a rule. Secondly, I don’t think you really need words to pick up on the incest vibe.

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    My theory about all the step sibling porn is that they’re trying to get you to pay for the “normal” porn. “Yes you can watch it for free…but wouldn’t it be better if it wasn’t so weird?” I don’t think most people find those story lines appealing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago*

    Sibling or other incestuous roleplay is super common actually. The step sibling stuff on porn sites afaik was once again enforced from their payment providers or advertisers. Because people who aren't related, but acting like they are, are apparently turning the world into Sodom & Gomorrah, and based on some of those weird virgin or conspiracytard comments here it seems that some people actually do believe this too.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (14 replies)
    [–] 17 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (8 children)

    The UK actually has a big issue with incest. Especially with cousins. Causes loads of child fatalities.

    Really big issue with people from Asia, incest is the norm there.

    Edit for those downvoting me is this a recorded issue. It's been in the news. Just because it doesnt fit the narrative or we arent meant to talk about those things doesn't mean it isn't happening.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 13 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    If 1/7000 kids are the product of incest, I'm guessing that 1//500 have been lied to about their biological father; looking at you royal family of England.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 13 points 2 years ago

    Well there's 8 billion humans and 331 million Americans so

    Over a million humans and almost 50k Americans.

    Rad

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    A bit off topic but, here is the latest episode from the podcast Citations Needed. They talk about the Atlantic's shitty politics. It made me not want to give them any views.

    https://citationsneeded.libsyn.com/episode-198-how-the-atlantic-magazine-helps-sell-austerity-and-war-to-middlebrow-liberals

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›