top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 161 points 2 years ago (34 children)

Using the term "normies" paints you as having a superiority complex, which isn't the best look.

  • source
  • hideshow 38 child comments
  • [–] 56 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I appreciate you calling out the use of the term "normie". Communities that frequently use such terms always end up with an unhealthy "us vs them" mentality.

    Like I'm not surprised people don't react well to someone bringing up privacy issues if said person starts the conversation with the mentality of "how do I enlighten this normie?"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [+] 35 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Have someone refer to you as a normie and lmk if it feels neutral or derogatory.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (30 replies)
    [+] 131 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)
  • [–] 50 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Everyone says this kind of stuff about any and every social issue. It drives me insane, do people not realize that it's a self-fulfilling prophecy? If everyone I heard say "there's no point fighting it" got together and fought it, they'd easily win.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • [–] 26 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    There is a 3rd argument which I think is a bit more valid in "I value the service I receive in exchange for my personal data"

    Using the internet without an adblocker, noscript, and whatever else is really nasty. But even if you aren't on these platforms, marketers are still building profiles on you. Honestly we need data privacy legislation and some real talk about marketing and the costs of using the internet as a society.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    That argument pisses me off.

    β€œI don’t mind so fuck you.”

    If you want to use those services, that’s your business. But I don’t use those services; they still keep my data.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    But I don’t use those services; they still keep my data.

    Exactly why we need data privacy laws. Sadly there are "profiles" out there for all of us, whether you chose to be tracked or not. Personally I think that any kind of sharing of personal data with marketers should be illegal nor should it be legal for any entity to purchase personal data without a signed consent form from the person in question.

    That'd probably end "free" services and our credit score system in the United States but honestly that kind of data collection is equivalent to stalking and unethical.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Maybe you can help me out.

    I see lots of folks here who are programmers or have a ton of knowledge on ways to get around the big 5 to maintain privacy, but as a layman with only so much time in the day, it's hard to avoid taking the path of least resistance when using the Internet.

    I am a musician with a public profile on Instagram, and many of my friends who are also artists use TikTok or YouTube to get their exposure. It's kind of a necessity if you want to simply book a gig at a venue (they will ask for your social media handles to see how many followers you have to determine if it's even worth having you on).

    As artists we are also not flush with cash to pay for all the privacy software or VPNs. On top of that, so much of our information is already out there, I'm not sure how we'd even start reeling it back in.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    you don't have to go all in at once, mate. you can start by getting most important things in your control: your browser and search engine.
    if you like the interface of Google chrome and can't part away with it: use brave. else highly recommended to use Firefox.
    if you just like Google search results, use startpage, else use duckduckgo or brave search.

    these two things alone would make a meaningful difference.

    then for neutering most of third party tracking: use a private DNS(I'd suggest nextdns). it's just a "add a URL and forget about it'. it'll stop the tracking significantly.

    then you can continue by replacing other inconsequential stuff like Google notes(use Joplin), Google assistant(don't use any of this "smart" crap), Google fit(just exercise regularly. you don't need to micromanage it).

    then next step would be to start making some tough decisions: replace the keylogger that is Google keyboard with it's open source equivalent heliboard.

    then eventually you can go hardcore and use Facebook and other crap on browser only.

    so, all in all, even if you do only the first two(or just first) step, you're already 50% there.

    let me know in case you got any questions. and happy journey.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

    I'll never give up. I'll shove my 256-bit AES encrypted USB stick so far up the glowy asses they start vomiting shit and USB drives. I still use YouTube and shit tho. I try and convert people. I've been successful getting quite a few people on Signal. The problem is that if there isn't interoperability and everyone's friends aren't on it some forget to even check the app or don't get notifications. If you leave message contents in notifications you're fucked anyway. Lol I feel their pain, but I wish I could get people to care before bad things happen. I mean, bad things have happened. We just gotta keep it up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 98 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    I recently got a confused look when I said that I pay for my email provider (3€/mo, but 1€/mo would also work).

    Many people don't realize that operating an email server creates cost and they pay with letting Google/Yahoo/… read and analyze their communication.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 96 points 2 years ago* (3 children)

    "But why would they care about MY data, I don't do anything special"

    Anyone outside of tech when I even passingly mention privacy

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] 65 points 2 years ago* (5 children)
  • [–] 25 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Do YOU have anything to hide??

    β€œYea my bank information, passwords, personal identity, identity of all my loved ones. But hey, if you hate having security and love being blackmailed and hate everyone who you have ever made contact in your life and wish to make their life hell then you do you and stay far the fuck away from me. We don’t know each other and we never will”

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago (10 children)

    What's the counter to that sentence then?

    Every time I try to explain why this is a dumb sentence using the door lock analogy I always get rebuffed by it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Do you have kids? Where do they go to school? What time are they off? When did you last go to the doctor? What medication do you use? Etc. Etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago

    "Do you have a shredder? Do you keep your payment information in an exposed location. If you found out a company leaked your credit card data, your phone number, everything you'd ever said to your therapist, how would you feel?"

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago*

    First, when you get into these arguments, always start from the viewpoint that these people do not see any worth in their data. Their convenience is worth way more than any privacy breach. That's why your goal is usually to convince them that privacy breaches can be a huge innconvenience for them, use their selfishness to advocate for their self-interest.

    Quick example, what defines something that needs to be hidden changes constantly with different governments and regulatory bodies. There's no telling if your current data won't be illegal or something in the future, causing you problems. That's why it's important to have protections for your data to begin with so a future government can't just unilaterally decide to trample all over your rights.

    Basically, see what they care about and try advocating from that viewpoint, not your personal viewpoint. There's a good chance you'll have a line of argument.

    I find that I have more success convincing people if I put their self-interest first and foremost instead of trying to explain some grand ideology. People want something tangible, not a hazy ideal. It's only when something affects them that they may change their views.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (8 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago

    It's not only online privacy. Every fucking major intersection in the city has cameras. There are no public places where there isn't a security camera watching. I can't even go to Wendy's without a camera watching me eat.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 60 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    I think the funniest part of this meme is every company bar Amazon, Discord (both not in market yet), and TikTok (Chinese) were confirmed to be a part of NSA's PRISM

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Severely lacking in car company logos.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 21 points 2 years ago* (3 children)

    Stupid question: What exactly are the dangers being implied here? I have accounts with all of these services although I don't use all of them. I know that they are using and selling my personal information, is there more? I have ways of doing things in private when I need and I'm aware that using these services has no expectations of absolute privacy.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 10 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    Privacy = freedom. If you don't have privacy, or to the extent you don't have privacy, you are in proportion not free.

    It seems to me this is the trade off we are all figuring out how to make. For example, I've considered not having a cell phone at all, but then I find it almost impossible to get a job, or operate in the economy. So I use a custom privacy ROM. I have no illusions that this is perfect, but at least a step in the right direction.

    I think the most practical answer is to gain knowledge of the situation, and limit our attack surface. I don't think there's any silver bullets, unless you want to live like the Amish (which, doesn't sound like a bad idea, either. If that's what you want and you can do it, go for it.)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [+] 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)
    load more comments (3 replies)
    [+] 9 points 2 years ago*
    load more comments
    view more: next β€Ί