Not sure what's going on, but I prefer Worms Armageddon.

Ikr! Let's just push all our issues onto him! Then we can complain about tories and start the cycle again!

Well, it's true. Don't you know mining for ebike batteries pollutes a lot? And bike lanes cause lots of traffic? /s

Damn DEI cyclists

Although walk > totally mechanical bicycles > scooters > electric bicycles > cars.

And especially the foreign cyclists

The bike, too, has been produced in a factory.

But we can reduce consumption, and production a bike causes significantly less pollution that production of a car.

Not for the consumption of end user. If they can get their money without end user they will totally drop everyone. They are totally doing it for greed, they are doing it for the game. Do you think they(rich/industry) will stop polluting if you bike everywhere and stop buying stuff?

Yet at the same time, there are people who cannot afford actually good products, are forced to buy fresh due to planned obsolescence or simply ate unable to buy anything environmentally friendly because there are no products that is/does that. Companies themselves could easily produce more environmentally friendly products, yet don't because it's cheaper and thus better for the profit margins.

The fault and responsibility lies at least as much with companies as it does with consumers/customers, if not more.

The structural integrity of the bicycle failed approximately 0.2 microseconds after the photo was taken, given a 20,000 kg weight was attached to the seatpost :>

70s.

The 1870s.

At least they accomplished something in the '90s. And yes, I know it went into effect in 1989, but that's essentially the '90s!

You happen to know the name of the movie?

Was it Planet of the Apes?

In fact, I don't think it's possible to slow our descent until we shed oil capitalism

Doubtful. Firstly because it's very difficult to keep track in war, and it's also difficult (morally too) to count the emission reductions from destruction and death.

And, secondly, because modern wars are integrated into economy and society. Well, Putin may try to change that and turn the whole economy into a war-oriented one (top down control and nationalization), which would be a huge blunder now.

Oh, thirdly, you're mostly referring to the US, so be specific.

Emissions of GHG can be measured at many different layers, you have to decide what analysis, what perspective, you are using; otherwise, you risk counting emissions multiple times. It's all accounting.

This is one conventional way: https://climate.mit.edu/explainers/scope-1-2-and-3-emissions

It is not easy, especially since a lot of data is missing.

I know that you want to say that the US is bad, and that is valid regardless of emissions.

https://journals.plos.org/climate/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pclm.0000569