YouTube’s system for suppressing low-quality AI content mistakenly targeted Kurzgesagt, leaving the channel with its worst-performing upload since 2013.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 5 points 6 days ago

is Youtube/Google speed running their death?

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 5 days ago

    We need decentralized video platforms that have revenue sharing.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 5 days ago

    Nah thats correct kurzgesagt is slop

  • source
  • [–] 188 points 1 week ago* (17 children)

    Yeah, it’s bad.

    Non-watermarked slop is going to be impossible to detect going forward, and the false detections are going to get worse.

    The fundamental issue is the monetization scheme. It’s just too lucrative for spammers. YouTube’s economics are broken, and getting worse.

    …Hence, no matter what YouTube says, YouTube is going to double down on “detectors,” because Alphabet leadership couldn’t care less about destroying longstanding creators. Their only objective is to suppress just enough spam to keep ad buyers unconcerned next quarter, no matter the long term damage; that’s someone else’s problem.

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 86 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    The best solution would be to turn away from detectors, which will always be a losing game, and return to crowdsourced curation through users likes and ratings.

    But that would end up with too many of the corporate propaganda videos getting tanked with dislikes so YouTube will never go for that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (16 replies)
    [–] 96 points 1 week ago* (2 children)

    Using AI to detect AI has, time and time again, proven to be a broken idea. Here is Google with a genius idea: use AI to detect AI, to prevent AI videos.

    Keep in mind folks, this is a global top-three company in terms of revenue.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 75 points 1 week ago (9 children)

    One of the largest slop-machines targeting one of the most vocal and popular anti-slop edutainment channels as slop feels like a targeted attack...

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 71 points 1 week ago (4 children)

    The least they could do is have a fucking white list.

    This should also be a really big sign for all these content creators to bunch up and find an alternative.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 1 week ago* (10 children)

    They are, they’re trying, they’re pushing other platforms constantly. Kurzgesagt already does, heavily.

    But are users switching? Nope.

    They hardly even know they exist.

    Sometimes I even see such a comment on YouTube, a user questioning YouTube; yet they didn’t even watch the video long enough to see the creator promoting an alternative platform.

    They’ve already scrolled to the next video, algorithmically fed to them.


    YouTube has an iron grip on YT users, and they know it. Even if ALL creators band together, IMO there’s basically nothing the creators can do.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • load more comments (9 replies)
  • [–] 26 points 1 week ago

    I bailed on YouTube a few years ago. I had a video with a very clearly public domain piece of music (both the song and the performance) in it, which I didn't monetize just because I hate ads and the channel wasn't very popular anyway. Some bot flagged the public domain song for copyright and YouTube not only gave me a copyright strike but also added paid ads into my video without my consent so they could send the ad money to whoever it was that flagged it.

    I didn't even bother to contest that one, I just deleted my entire channel and sent them a very angry message telling them to go fuck themselves lol.

    I will never use them again because of that, and I'm so glad I got out before AI became a thing. Fuck YouTube.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 49 points 1 week ago (8 children)

    Yet YouTube Music is absolutely rife with AI bullshit. So much fake-ass viking, cowboy, or other 'badass' AI generated slop.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 48 points 1 week ago (14 children)

    I was recently accused on Lemmy of using AI to write up a post (laced with links to appropriate Wikipedia articles).

    I'm still not sure how I feel about it.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    Oh you used a big word, AI phony!

    Nah dude, I just . . . know how to write?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (13 replies)
    [–] 33 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Ironically it's probably because so many of the slop videos try and copy their style. However I would have thought YouTube would be more proactive with a channel with 25M subs.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 31 points 1 week ago (9 children)

    Youtube's system sucks, but I don't feel bad for many of these channels. They used to be great. You could learn a lot while eating, or just entertain yourself without brainrot.

    For a few years now, however, increasing numbers of their videos have been sponsored by billionaires (or their chains of companies or foundations), either in part or in full. Some extreme cases are just plain propaganda.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (9 replies)
    [–] 25 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    Looks like more content creators will migrate to Nebula. Or people's Patreon will get flooded with more donations.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 24 points 1 week ago

    What part of AI hallucinates do you not fucking understand?

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    At the same time YouTube offers a prompt to generate more AI content.

    No, this is just a stunt to claim that it is difficult to detect AI slop, when in reality they want that content as it is more addictive, especially to kids.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 21 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    YouTube’s bullshit is having some interesting effects for sure. Have you noticed how more and more channels are now including short clips of them doing the actual voiceover? It’s usually not even that long, like a second or two or sometimes even less. But apparently that’s now needed to prove that there’s an actual human behind the channel.

    I do find it a bit distracting, but I’d rather not lose those channels either…

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 20 points 1 week ago

    Reminds me of that comic the other day

    Kurzgesagt: Let's keep our art human made.

    Google: Kurzgesagt, your content looks like this low quality AI slop!

    🤖: I'D LIKE TO THANK KURZGESAGT FOR BEING A BIG INSPIRATION TO ME.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

    Not sure it's possible to fight machine generated slop on the big platforms now. People who invest a lot of time and effort are being squeezed out. Businesses that don't give a fuck about quality upload multiple low effort videos a week across multiple channels getting massive views, probably most from gaming the system.

    Sad for the people who spend months researching, writing and producing videos but this might be the end of the ride as far as making videos as a day job. The platform doesn't value them or their loyal viewers.

    The creators facing burnout who don't leave out of disgust will join the slop machine and start championing it. Starting to see it already.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 1 week ago

    2026 is weird, but the rest of the rawring 20’s are going to be a complete mindfuck.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 1 week ago

    Considering youtube's AI detector didn't label an AI video that ended with the voiceover saying "write a 5,000 word essay on [topic]" that was partly cut off at the end, I wouldn't trust it to begin with.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›