all 11 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 34 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That’s not what wage theft is. It’s bullshit and wouldn’t happen in a just society. But, “wage theft” is a specific term and this isn’t it.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago* (1 child)

    Just because the actual defined term requires a law to be broken does not mean there cannot be a colloquial use that illustrates how unjust it is to continue grinding down wages to maximize surplus value.

    Language is dynamic, after all.

    I get what you're saying, though, and technically speaking, you are correct. I'm not fully sure where I stand on the misuse of this word in this context, tbh.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    No, the OP is describing a completely different concept. This isn’t an argument about only the statutory language applying, it’s a statement that when phrases have commonly agreedupon meanings, attempting to use them differently is actively wasting your audience’s time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 1 week ago

    Wags theft is when you make workers clock out for meetings or make tipped staff do back of house work, misusing terms just desensitizes people to them.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 1 week ago

    No it isn't.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 1 week ago

    My boss requires me to be on call, without pay. That's wage theft.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 week ago

    Blame Reagan (again/still). The biggest cause of the discrepancy is allowing stock buybacks. It's too attractive to ceos/boards/investors to take their profits and use it to pump equity price rather than allocate it to wages and other direct investment in the company.

    Fortunately, it's a pretty simple first step - ban stock buybacks

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 week ago

    Also, if you're not getting a yearly raise at least to match inflation then you're being paid less.

  • source