top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 98 points 4 days ago (1 child)

Headline:

Signal is working on registration without a phone number. But what form will it take?

30 July 2026 10:30 CEST

Signal is working on a way to optionally sign up without a phone number. The feature has not yet been officially confirmed, and it is not yet known whether it will be available to all users or in what form.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

    I've always said it. Best form to prevent spam is to have allow list as a default. You should only be able to receive messages from pre-approved people.

    I have allow listed my email for ages and it's great.

    But obviously advertisers and business hate it because then they need your true consent to send you shit.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    And in the case of Telegram, if they did that why would anyone sign up for their premium account?

    I tried using Telegram and the amount of spam I would receive was annoying, but what was even more annoying was finding out that the 'Restrict messages from users not in your contacts' setting is paywalled. Telegram profits off of the spammers on their network.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 4 days ago

    Another W for Signal

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    Sooo instead you will be required to pay by card and thus have your identity proven by financial institutions behind? Big ooof.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    I think you're jumping the gun a bit. They're just saying that requiring a phone number added a barrier against spammers and they want to be sure this change doesn't open the flood gates.

    From the article:

    "We gotta figure out some way to induce a cost for signing up without a phone number”, Kret said.

    It’s unclear whether this means that registration without a phone number will become a paid feature.

    However, “cost” does not necessarily mean a monetary fee; it could also refer to another barrier designed to prevent abuse.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 days ago (1 child)

    Even if it was a card, privacy.com for the win as it allows for any address and name to be used with their debit cards!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    For the low, low price of the transaction fee and all data about the transaction!

    Is there a system in the US that doesn’t need an overhaul at this point?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 3 days ago

    I'll be happy if it happens but I need to see it. It would be significant to use Signal without phone number but one option they are considering to combat scam is to use bank card payment... Signal's issue still remains the centralisaion

  • source
  • [–] 27 points 4 days ago

    Ten years too late.

    This could have had a far greater impact when whatsapp exodus or controversy happend in 2021. I bet they have reached a stall in the number of new accounts and donations are drying out.

    I have also read rumors about them thinking about tying this to a one time payment to prevent bot registration

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 4 days ago (1 child)

    They say they need to figure out how to counter/avoid spam/abuse first. And that makes a lot of sense to me. I mean, just look at Telegram (which is ironically going the opposite route nowadays).

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 4 days ago (10 children)

    Telegram requires a phone number, last I checked, and Desktop needs to be signed in to from mobile. So the same as Signal for "Abuse Prevention" (TM)

    And it's only good for connecting to bot networks to deliver... Questionable content.

    Most of my torrents ceom from Telegram bots, now that sites keep getting taken down who hosted them.

    As to actually using it?

    Well, the only contacts I have are pirate bots, and that will never change.

    Still more than I have on Signal, though ;)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • load more comments (10 replies)
  • [–] 8 points 3 days ago

    They already lost users in authoritarian countries like Russia or China, where Signal is blocked and you can't get an SMS via a VPN, so registration or logging in with 2FA becomes impossible.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 4 days ago

    This is the main reason I don't use Signal, so depending on if and how it gets implemented, I may finally use it. Getting other people on board will be its own fight of course.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 3 days ago*

    It would be good if true, for a privacy first chat, asking for your phone number is the first and biggest red flag.

    Someone knows how Delta Chat handles the spam problem? Or spam is only a problem that comes with wider adoption?

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 4 days ago

    Considering I've been sending everyone to Session instead, since I refuse to put a phone number linked to my name, address, and payment information in to a "privacy focused" messenger...

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 4 days ago

    We had an encrypted chat for a bit before I realized it was completely pointless with literally everyone in it but one or two having entirely stock phones with in-built Ai and tracking mechanisms. We used XMPP.

    Since it was for a Jellyfin server, it basically meant anyone on an unmodified Google or Apple phone was basically a door to a seach of that data from either company for the text logged into each chatroom by each user, and displayed. Unless everyone is secure, no one is.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 4 days ago (3 children)

    Will this allow people to install it on multiple devices? Right now I can't have it on my phone AND tablet and it sucks...

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (7 children)

    My biggest issue with Signal is that it doesn’t reliably work. I’ll message back and forth with a friend on there and then receive a text message a week later asking why I’m not responding on Signal. And it’s because I didn’t receive the messages.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 days ago

    Yeah happens to me from time to time. I think it's special treatment by Android OEMs. I think Samsung really likes to kill background apps even if explicitly told not to. see here.

    Maybe It's expected behavior if Signal is not being used that often. Still weird WhatsApp never has that problem

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 3 days ago

    That's really weird. I use it for my out-of-band chat for work since we all mute our Teams after hours. It's been reliable the entire 3 years we've been using it. Maybe I'm just really lucky?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 3 days ago*

    Weird I have never experienced this (or it was so long ago I don't remember). We've been using Signal absolutely reliably for our family Chat for many years now, and also with other friends.

    I don't think Google Play Services are required, but

    your power optimisation settings might prevent signal from running in the background

    could have sth to do with it. And that's accessible through Settings, an App Permissions thing IIRC (although I never needed to do that manually either).

    PS: I sent you a dm on a different matter.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 3 points 3 days ago

    Haven’t they been working on this for months? I could have sworn I heard of this well over a year ago.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›