Only about 53% of U.S. adults own homes, far below the commonly cited 65% homeownership rate, according to new Federal Reserve research that paints a starker picture of access to homeownership.

(PSA: Never trust the state's statistics.)

all 11 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 1 point 4 minutes ago

The commonly reported statistic asks, what percentage of adults live in homes owned by a resident, rather than rent? That's been steady in the mid-60 percentages for decades.

This new paper from the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis offers another statistic for consideration: the ratio of homeowners to the adult population.

The main categories of people who differ in this proposed methodology:

  • People who live in group home settings that do not ordinarily count as renters, like dorms, nursing homes, and prisons, are now included in the denominator (and not considered homeowners). Previously, these didn't count towards the ratio in either the numerator or denominator.
  • Adult family members of homeowners who do not pay rent (adult children, parents of an owner, etc.), or adult roommates paying for a room. This turns out to be about 13.9% of the population.

Most importantly, these are unevenly distributed by geographical region, age, other demographics. Not all of these are bad (nothing wrong with multi-generation living arrangements), but they can show trends across time or place, and pick up less noticeable trends in people's living situations more broadly.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 hours ago

    Yeah, now factor in what percentage of those homes are actually owned by the bank.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 5 hours ago

    Because Blackstone owns them all, now.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 4 hours ago (1 child)

    Who owns the rest of the houses?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 6 hours ago

    The ratio of home ownership probably looks closer to the distribution of the demographics of congress than that of America.

  • source
  • [–] 34 points 12 hours ago (1 child)

    Now let’s get numbers for USians under 50, and USians who make under the median income. 53% is still too high.

    Cowards.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 11 hours ago

    This is anecdotal and with a few caveats: In my area, and people I work with (which are generally good jobs) I’d say of those 40 and up it’s something like 75%. Of the other 25% that are living in apts or rental houses, I’d say 10% is due to choice. So maybe 15% want to own an home but can’t. One other thing to note is in this area, Raleigh area and suburbs, home prices are reasonable, especially when you get out a little. Now the home I just purchased almost 4 years ago has almost doubled in price in the last 10-15 years or so. So if I had purchased the same house I’m in, in 2010 or so, I would have spent almost half as much money. No my salary hasn’t doubled in 16 years so there’s that.

    Under 40, the story is way different. Probably more like 25% own homes. Shit is just way too expensive. And again my experience is with people making decent salaries in IT and academia. There is no way in hell someone 25 work two retail jobs could even touch the down payment, let alone the mortgage without 6 other roommates. Case in point, my son’s rent on a 1 bedroom apt is 2x what my first mortgage was on a 4 bedroom in 2001.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 11 hours ago*

    The traditional homeownership rate, tracked by the U.S. Census Bureau, measures the share of occupied homes in which the owner lives. The new measure from the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, called the homeowners-to-population ratio, or HPOP, instead calculates the share of adults who own a home.

    For any Canadians reading, this almost certainly applies to us as well as we determine the home ownership rate in the same flawed way. It misses all sorts of living situations such as adult children living with parents, people renting a room, people renting non-legal suites in a house where the other half is occupied by the owner, etc.

  • source
  • [–] -1 points 4 hours ago

    Why do they have to research this? Just ask people.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 11 hours ago

    Yeah 53% is likely incorrect as well. Census "data" is objectively bad for meaningful information.

  • source