Climate change and more than a century of overzealous fire suppression are now fueling wildfires so severe that they’re wiping out the very forests that need fire to thrive — leaving iconic landscapes at risk of turning into brush and scrub, permanently.

Over the past quarter century, high-severity wildfires have burned 2.3 million acres of California’s forestland so completely that the trees are unlikely to return on their own — according to a working draft of the state’s new reforestation strategy obtained by CalMatters.

all 16 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 9 points 15 hours ago

The problem is largely down to climate change, mismanagement of water, invasive species, and Conservatives.

  1. Climate change seems obvious, but trees are generally pretty reliant on having specific temperature ranges, and specific conditions. As climate change gets worse, the more extreme weather events get worse. Extreme conditions can kill trees, evaporate surface water, deprive areas of rain, kill bushes, impact animals etc. Individual trees are decently likely to survive one bad year, but sustained droughts/heat/irregular weather patterns etc can change the surrounding forest, and trees are a lot more the effect of specific forest conditions than the cause.

  2. Mismanagement of water is obvious, huge amounts of water are being pumped from reservoirs, dropping goundwater levels to the points that trees dont have access. Rivers and lakes are being contained, and not allowed to flood. As previously wet ground dries out (both from lack of rain, and from not having rivers), its profile changes, and the kinds of trees it can support changes. But the kinds of trees that dry ground can support often cant survive the other conditions (elevation, temperature, soil Ph, animals etc).

  3. Invasive species. Bark Beetles are one of the biggest problems, but spongy moths and other invasive insects are killing trees by the bucketfull. Additionally, invasive species like eucalyptus, palm, and salt-cedar restrict water access, ruin the ground, and choke out native trees. Invasive bushes like tree of heaven, spanish broom, greater periwinkle and giant reed can grow quickly, before dying and drying out during a particularly harsh summer, this dried plant mat makes for fire ladders, easy kindling and massively wildfire risk.

  4. Conservatives. Conservatives have been pushing to allow private companies and owners to destroy forests, wetlands and other necessary habitat for basically whatever reason. Conservatives push to allow companies like nestle to pump unlimited water from aquafers, and allow AI data centers to take whatever is left. Conservatives have been consistently anti-science and anti-education, and both are needed to restore forests.

  • source
  • [–] 28 points 23 hours ago* (1 child)

    Californian climate refugee here. The issue isn't that they can't plant more trees. The issue (dependent on species, of course) is that the trees have stopped sprouting at the same time that they've been under a massive decades long assault by an invasive species, bark beetles:

    Bark beetles are most commonly recognized by their impact on the lumber industry. Massive outbreaks of mountain pine beetles in western North America after about 2005 have killed millions of acres of forest from New Mexico to British Columbia.[20] Bark beetles enter trees by boring holes in the bark of the tree, sometimes using the lenticels, or the pores plants use for gas exchange, to pass through the bark of the tree.[3] As the larvae consume the inner tissues of the tree, they often consume enough of the phloem to girdle the tree, cutting off the spread of water and nutrients. Ambrosia beetles are also known to aid in the spread of pathogens, such as diseases that can cause cankers, further damaging the trees they infect.[21] Like many other insects, Scolytinae emit pheromones to attract conspecifics, which are thus drawn to trees already colonized by bark beetles. This can result in heavy infestations and eventually death of the tree.[3][22] Many are also attracted to ethanol produced as a byproduct of microbial growth in the dead woody tissues.[23] Increases in international trade, as well as the use of wood containers for storage, has aided numerous species of bark beetle in spreading across the world.[24] They are also extremely adaptable and able to quickly spread through new environments, as seen in France with eleven different species.[25] Bark beetle infestations are also predicted to increase with global warming, meaning infestations will most likely increase in frequency as temperatures rise.[26][27] Besides the fact that these rising temperatures provide the optimal conditions for larval growth, the development time that the larvae need to become an adult also drops, from 8–9 weeks to 6–7 weeks. As a third the result of global warming, the breeding season of the bark beetle is extended, meaning that number of generations per year will increase.[28] All these factors contribute to an increasing amount of bark beetles and will thus likely result in an increasing frequency of infestations. In the past, fire has been suggested as potential mechanism for controlling bark beetle populations; however, most studies of wildfire after beetle outbreaks have found no effect of beetle-caused tree mortality on wildfire size or severity.

    In the Napa Valley, the hillsides were covered in Douglas Fir. About 20 years ago, they began to die as the bark beetles spread along the ridgelines, leaving swathes of dead, hollowed out tree trunks. It was bad, but manageable at first - the fir were still sprouting seedlings.

    But after things continued to get hotter, the seedling growth slowed. The forests got drier, filled with dead timber, and between 2017 - 2021, about half of the western hills and most of the eastern ridge was burnt. And when I say burnt, I do not mean your standard burn - it was razed to the ground by fire tornadoes 90' tall, in places that hadn't burnt in over 200 years.

    Five years later, the forest is coming back - but not the same. There are bay laurel and oak seedlings now about 5' tall - they're adapted for hotter weather. Normally, the Douglas Fir would be there as well, but there are no seedlings at all.

    It's become too hot for them to germinate in the Napa Valley. The seeds won't sprout.

    If there's one small silver lining, it's that the big trees will eventually come back - just not the Douglas Fir. The more heat resistant Ponderosa has begun showing up, and in 20 - 30 years will likely become the dominant big tree on the ridgelines.

    20 years ago, the Napa Valley was like Bordeaux. Now the climate is like Sicily, and the deep forest is gone.

    Visit your local forest now. Savor what it is NOW. Because it's very likely you will live to see it burn, and once it burns, it will never come back the same way again.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    Which means it will eventually turn to desert.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 23 hours ago (1 child)

    Is it always forest to desert, or are their other options to shift to?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

    It ain’t gonna be frozen tundra unless nuclear winter happens first.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 16 hours ago

    "California can’t replant its forests fast enough to ..." ...to fuel its wildfires as it tries to do?
    Maybe try something else.

  • source
  • [–] -1 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Don't worry, California. I've started recycling my plastic bottles. Climate change should be over in no time now.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 23 hours ago* (2 children)

    For anyone who hasn't seen it:

    "Plastic Recycling is an Actual Scam" by Climate Town: https://youtu.be/PJnJ8mK3Q3g

    (Edit to add Nebula link: https://nebula.tv/videos/climatetown-plastic-recycling-is-an-actual-scam-climate-town/ )

    "i'm pretty sure recycling isn't real" by David Achu: https://youtu.be/68zjxTTl5Ik

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

    Do you have a more relible source than some youtuber?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments