I hate this graph. First, the ceiling is 2.5%, but the floor is -0.5%, which skews the data to look more impressive at the top end and show the floor more drastically. The second is that it starts at 1950, skips 30 years, and then goes in 20 year segments. Third is that half of the graph is guess work. Sure, maybe it's a good guess, but estimating population growth 80 years into the future based on information from the baby boomer generation is wild. Over all, this is a graph with an agenda. Maybe the agenda is needed and necessary, but math isn't biased. Math is absolute. Skewing the math to make it say what you want it to say is bad practices.
post
Is that a bad thing?
We are running out of space to support the population.
Standard of life is shit at best.
Future generations will curse us for bringing into the world.
Standard of life won't necessarily improve with fewer workers
And certainly won't improve when you have hungry children waiting for you while you are working 2 jobs.
Before you could fund your entire household with 1 income and the result was a population boom and the decline started when the standard of life started declining.
we are not running out of space, that's ecofascist propaganda. We could probably support like.. idk, 10x more people if we wanted to?
The problem isn't the population size, it's how we handle things. We have to stop relying on fossil fuels that dump poison into the air, stop having everyone drive all the time, stop eating meat all the time, stop having it be normal to live in a massive house with 5 km² of yard.. etc etc..
We need to model things much more like Hong Kong et al (or the netherlands, if asia scares you), than america, if we want to have a nice world to live in.
We could probably support like… idk, 10x more people if we wanted to?
Wrong. We're drastically over populated and rapidly running out of time and resources.
Stop repeating propaganda and actually research the things you want to believe in.
90% of earths topsoil is at risk of depletion by 2050
Global freshwater demand will exceed supply 40% by 2030
Global human population has surpassed Earth’s sustainable carrying capacity.
Global carbon emissions are still rising
The arctic sea ice extent is declining rapidly and we're likely headed into a Blue Ocean Event later this year, and potentially a double BOE depending on how the El Nino and summer in the southern hemisphere go.
The world is likely to exceed a key global warming target soon but the earths alebedo with the declining sea ice and lack of cloud cover will impact these numbers massively and isn't being predicted for, which means that 4.5c above the baseline by 2060 is now possible.
Is that a bad thing?
It is for the increasingly small number of working age people having to pay the retirement and medical expenses of the increasingly large number of old people.
People are unable to afford groceries for themselves and having even 1 or 2 children on an already strained budget and that budget is from both parents working 2 jobs.
The retirement system was conceptualised in an age when 1 household could support itself with 1 income while having 3-5 children and could also afford a car, house and vacation, none of that is possible these days and keeps getting worse so declining population is the direct consequence for worsening standard of life.

all 15 comments