▲ 31 ▼ The 4th Circuit Says Border Agents Can Search Your Phone By Hand, No Suspicion Required (www.eff.org) submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by beep@piefed.world [M] to c/tech@piefed.world 8 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 18 points 4 days ago (2 children) permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] HubertManne@piefed.social 3 points 3 days ago (1 child) this is just boarders. that 100 mile also applies to all international airports so this map is missing all the littel circles through out the continent. saint louis 100% has one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 1 point 3 days ago (1 child) I checked on that and Google says it isn't true. International airports don't get that 100 mile rule. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 3 days ago (1 child) do you have a link to what google said because I have seen this for a long time. Its not like something mentioned once recently in articles. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 1 point 2 days ago (1 child) It's something I heard for a long time too. That's why I was confused by the map I posted and googled why no map showed the airports zones. It turned out to be a myth and the area outside of international airports doesn't count. https://forumtogether.org/article/explainer-u-s-border-patrol-authorities-and-the-100-mile-border-zone/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 2 days ago Im looking over the scotus 1973 and whats funny is they did not allow a warrantless search even within the 100 mile border. Which is odd given ice just tossing private homes in chicago with no warrant. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago Also they can search phones at customs, many of which are well outside that 100-mile zone, Denver, for example. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 3 points 3 days ago (1 child) this is just boarders. that 100 mile also applies to all international airports so this map is missing all the littel circles through out the continent. saint louis 100% has one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 1 point 3 days ago (1 child) I checked on that and Google says it isn't true. International airports don't get that 100 mile rule. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 3 days ago (1 child) do you have a link to what google said because I have seen this for a long time. Its not like something mentioned once recently in articles. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 1 point 2 days ago (1 child) It's something I heard for a long time too. That's why I was confused by the map I posted and googled why no map showed the airports zones. It turned out to be a myth and the area outside of international airports doesn't count. https://forumtogether.org/article/explainer-u-s-border-patrol-authorities-and-the-100-mile-border-zone/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 2 days ago Im looking over the scotus 1973 and whats funny is they did not allow a warrantless search even within the 100 mile border. Which is odd given ice just tossing private homes in chicago with no warrant. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 1 point 3 days ago (1 child) I checked on that and Google says it isn't true. International airports don't get that 100 mile rule. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 3 days ago (1 child) do you have a link to what google said because I have seen this for a long time. Its not like something mentioned once recently in articles. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 1 point 2 days ago (1 child) It's something I heard for a long time too. That's why I was confused by the map I posted and googled why no map showed the airports zones. It turned out to be a myth and the area outside of international airports doesn't count. https://forumtogether.org/article/explainer-u-s-border-patrol-authorities-and-the-100-mile-border-zone/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 2 days ago Im looking over the scotus 1973 and whats funny is they did not allow a warrantless search even within the 100 mile border. Which is odd given ice just tossing private homes in chicago with no warrant. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 3 days ago (1 child) do you have a link to what google said because I have seen this for a long time. Its not like something mentioned once recently in articles. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 1 point 2 days ago (1 child) It's something I heard for a long time too. That's why I was confused by the map I posted and googled why no map showed the airports zones. It turned out to be a myth and the area outside of international airports doesn't count. https://forumtogether.org/article/explainer-u-s-border-patrol-authorities-and-the-100-mile-border-zone/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 2 days ago Im looking over the scotus 1973 and whats funny is they did not allow a warrantless search even within the 100 mile border. Which is odd given ice just tossing private homes in chicago with no warrant. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 1 point 2 days ago (1 child) It's something I heard for a long time too. That's why I was confused by the map I posted and googled why no map showed the airports zones. It turned out to be a myth and the area outside of international airports doesn't count. https://forumtogether.org/article/explainer-u-s-border-patrol-authorities-and-the-100-mile-border-zone/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 2 days ago Im looking over the scotus 1973 and whats funny is they did not allow a warrantless search even within the 100 mile border. Which is odd given ice just tossing private homes in chicago with no warrant. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 2 days ago Im looking over the scotus 1973 and whats funny is they did not allow a warrantless search even within the 100 mile border. Which is odd given ice just tossing private homes in chicago with no warrant. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago Also they can search phones at customs, many of which are well outside that 100-mile zone, Denver, for example. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 9 points 4 days ago I don’t think we have rights anymore. Not unless we are self-enforcing those rights. permalink fedilink source
all 8 comments