MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Billionaire Elon Musk likely broke Wisconsin law when he handed out $1 million checks to voters in the 2025 state Supreme Court election, a bipartisan panel has found.

The Wisconsin Elections Commission last week referred two complaints to the Brown County district attorney’s office, which can choose to bring criminal charges over violating the state law against election bribery. Prosecutors have 40 days to report back to the commission.

Musk, the founder of SpaceX and CEO of Tesla, was deeply involved in the effort to flip majority control of the highest court in battleground Wisconsin.

The tech titan and groups he supported spent at least $20 million on the candidate backed by Republicans, Brad Schimel. However, he lost by 10 percentage points to Democratic-backed candidate Susan Crawford.

A month after the lopsided loss, Musk announced that he would be spending far less on political campaigns. Spending on the election topped $100 million, making it the most expensive judicial race in U.S. history.

Prosecutors will decide if Musk should be charged over the $1 million checks

The complaints, which are confidential under state law, were brought by voters in Milwaukee and Green Bay, which is in Brown County. Musk handed out checks at a rally there just days before the election.

The Wisconsin Elections Commission, consisting of three Democrats and three Republicans, voted 5-1 in closed session on Thursday to refer the complaints to the district attorney, the commission’s spokesperson Emilee Miklas said.

Brown County District Attorney David Lasee, a Republican, did not immediately return a message seeking comment Tuesday.

The motion approved by the elections commission said it found probable cause that Musk broke Wisconsin law by making a social media post offering $1 million to people who voted in the Supreme Court election “in order to induce them to vote in that election.”

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 164 points 1 week ago* (6 children)

How about we arrest and charge that motherfucker?

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 54 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    Can't do that. It would be bad for business.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 8 points 1 week ago* (2 children)

    Unfortunately, the ones that are supposed to do that, all work with him. I mean it's so obviously clear at this point. So many things have happened in this past little while that should have been instant arrest or investigations, or you know, just plain people getting fired or removal from offices. But it's clear, they all work together.

    I guess you could say, the justice system overwhelmingly (not everyone but most) works for the executive branch now. It bows down like a little bitch and licks the executive branch boots.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 80 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Until he gets arrested, it's meaningless.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 62 points 1 week ago
    [–] 48 points 1 week ago (5 children)

    He did. They should make his punishment consist primarily of public service. Like 20,000 hours that has to be completed within 4 years.

    His money is endless, but not his time.

    If he has to spend eight hours a day 5 days a week for the next 4 years picking up trash along the side of the road, he's not going to have time to try to interfere with elections.

    And he may actually learn a lesson about hard work. That's what justice is supposed to look like.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 week ago

    If he has to spend eight hours a day 5 days a week for the next 4 years picking up trash along the side of the road, he's not going to have time to try to interfere with elections.

    That still leaves the weekend and the remaining 16 hours a day. You would think that's not enough time to do anything extracurricular, but you might be surprised how much sleep can be skipped during a drug-fueled manic episode.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 45 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Likely?

    It's called buying votes.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    They're so terrified of setting the precedent of sending a rich person to prison. If a crime of this magnitude was committed by a poor person they would be disappeared for eternity.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    So it turns out that all this time a law is only really a law if it's enforced. Most of my life I assumed laws were laws when they became laws. But nope, the past few years have demonstrated that my assumption was false.

    So no, he didn't break any Wisconsin laws because they ain't gonna do shit.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 26 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    Golly, I wonder what Dear Leader would say about that?

    gBdZn5a36JH671U.jpg

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    Except that's not how it went down, it wasn't simply trying to get people to vote, you had to sign a form of intent saying you would vote for their candidate before you would be eligible for whatever piddly shit they were bribing people with, it should absolutely be an open and shut case in any just world.. but

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 23 points 1 week ago

    Mee-lon borke the law countless times. The president of the us of na broke the law countless times (the supreme court said that's ok).

  • source
  • [+] 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 3 days ago)
    [removed by mod]
  • source
  • [–] 22 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    Likely!?!

    I'm so sick of this kid glove horseshit.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 20 points 1 week ago

    yet nobody did anything for 1+years, not even the DNC which they dint bother do any investigating the election machines.

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 1 week ago

    And???

    It ain't like the "justice system" is going to do jack shit about it. You have to be poor in order to get your ass thrown in prison.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 1 week ago

    Throw that bitch ass in prison

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 week ago

    Next time I break the law I'll take my punishment as a sternly worded letter from the doj too thanks.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Even if they fined him a trillion dollars he would still be a billionaire.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 week ago

    So fucking do something already.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Whoa! I know a whole set of Americans who are apparently really upset at immigrants coming and breaking the law, or so they say. This will be the top story on Fox News any minute now.

    Unfortunately though, he's too rich for consequences, and if recent history has shown us anything, it's that our corpo overlords think no consequences == no crime.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 8 points 1 week ago

    No kidding bribing people to vote is clearly illegal.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago
    [–] 6 points 1 week ago

    Who is going to enforce that?

    Minimum wage employees???

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago

    If you are worth a trillion dollars, you can't break the law

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago

    Don't worry, I'm sure he'll have to pay a big fine of 0.000,000,00,000,001% of his net worth. Oh, and pinky promise not to do it again.

  • source
  • That was only last year? It feels like three lifetimes ago.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    "Elon broke the law"

    There fixed it for tou

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›