top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 65 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Not all Republicans are old.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 1 month ago

    Yeah, there are several new generations of fascists ready to take over when the old ones die off, with exactly the same opinions and goals. It is not an age thing, it is a class thing, but oligarch mouthpieces love to spout this particular brand of obfuscation as part of their propaganda, because it seems to be really succesful strategy.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 48 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Billionaires are ruining it. Don't let the NYT shift the blame.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    The boomers that vote for far right grifters and are happy to pull up the ladder behind themselves certainly deserve a share of the blame too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago (10 children)

    Nearly half of boomers have no retirement savings. Blame them all you want, but the problem is the rich. Always has been. Always will be.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    The population that voted for them even though it hurts them are still at fault, even if they didn't write the billionaire backed legislation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (10 children)

    Not all boomers. Sorry, blaming "boomers" is rather naive.

    I've been around long enough to remember boomers blaming all the things on Silent/Greatest Generation. They had all the answers and could not wait to take over.

    Just sayin' - I'm starting to see a pattern here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (26 children)

    The problem with boomers, though, is that they formed such a large voting block that their generation has been able to steer the political system in the US. We started seeing change in the 90s and it was gaining momentum in the early 00s, but the reactionaries went full tilt on fascism as a result.

    This is a gross oversimllified take so please don't think it's meant as any kind of scholarly dissertation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 26 child comments
  • load more comments (26 replies)
  • load more comments (9 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 39 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Does NY Times want to distract us from having class solidarity?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 27 points 1 month ago

    No. Voter apathy, arrogance and virtue signalling transcends age and gender.

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    They have you focused on old people so you are distracted from the fact that capitalism is the problem

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    This is the answer. The fad (psyop?) of blaming "boomers" for all the world's ills is annoying AF.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 21 points 1 month ago (18 children)

    Yes.

    We need to set limits for the age of our politicians. These people are too old and frail to lead.

    One day they’re cheating the stock market with insider trading and the next they’re falling down and getting gravely injured.

    Or they disappear into a nursing home because of their advanced dementia, or they just turn the capitol into their nursing home, like Feinstein.

    Or they’re taking up space on some panel despite their aggressive cancer diagnosis, only to die and delay government hearings.

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • load more comments (18 replies)
    [–] 20 points 1 month ago (12 children)

    No war but class war, brother

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • load more comments (12 replies)
    [–] 20 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    That’s a funny way to spell “sociopathic rich bastards”

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    sociopathic rich bastards

    I mean they are generally old too, it's just not their defining characteristic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I mean, most of them have kids and grandkids, so that money is going to end up in the hands of the young in any case. And they were raised by sociopaths, so the chances that they will be as well is non-zero...

    In any case, when outlets like the NYT do things like this, they know that they are using a red herring....let's get some inter-generational froth going and people won't notice who is making off with all the money and power...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    There's some truth to the inter-generational conflict. A lot of the boomers and early Gen X were granted limited access to the tools of the owner class (eg. "Reverse Mortgages" are really just a tiny version of the same equity financing the ultra-rich use to access their wealth without sacrificing control of their companies or paying taxes). They've socially conditioned and co-opted a lot of our elders into protecting their interests for them, however you are correct that it's more of an attempt to obfuscate the real threat (the sociopathic rich bastards) and keep us fighting with each other rather than organizing against them.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Nah. It's capitalism and social engineering by the powers that be. That shit is divisive as fuck. The old will be dead soon enough, but that 1% at the top bullshit has gone on for a very long time already. Decades, generations.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 month ago

    We don't get a choice

    As long as what you want is what the economic elites want, it happens.

    The correlative factor between what the regular people want and what ends up happening is 0.05. elites are 0.78. business interests are 0.48

    If you want to see change become an oligarch, and if not join a business lobbyist group. If you can't do either you're SOL.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago

    It's not about age, it's about corruption. Old politicians have had more time to make deals, forge alliances, and prove themselves useful to money.

    One way to mitigate this is term limits for Congress. Force them out before they can do too much damage, before they can entrench themselves, and gain the support of some billionaire. Less reason to throw millions at a candidate if they'll be gone in eight years.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Old people are ruining democracy everywhere.

    They created a system to ensure they have comfortable pensions and now our lives are getting more expensive and more difficult because we have to fund their retirement plans and that's why they refuse to step down because they know they are screwed if we take control and start prioritising OUR generation and future generations so shit like this never happens again, wishful thinking... we're fucked either way...

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 10 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    The problem is really simple to solve.

    Politicians represent old people because old people vote. Young people always want to break the system and make a new one, but old people know how to use the existing system to get what they want. .

    Young people have all the power they need to be heard, but they just don't take it. They think voting changes nothing, but they don't realize it changes everything.

    If young people voted, politicians would be forced to take their issues seriously.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Young people always want to break the system and make a new one, but old people know how to use the existing system to get what they want

    yeah no. most young people I know dont know jack shit about politics. they're purely consumers who use TikTok, buy Starbucks and shop on Amazon. Theres nothing breaking the system about them. They don't vote because of lobbyists who make sure they aren't represented. When they feel represented they vote.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • The generation that was raised on prioritizing short term solutions because the constant threat of nuclear war made any long term planning seem hopeless is ruining the USA???

  • source
  • It's been ruined for a long time, big money interests has always had a stranglehold on it. That tends to be older people sure but not all of them are beyond 30 either.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago

    Money is, for sure.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    No, the low IQ wing nuts who make up at least 50% of the population who allow people like Trump to become president. They literally ruin anything good we could have a society 😒

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    They are ruining it, man... Any day now, it will be ruined... Not exactly right now probably, but maybe soon likely... This is a thing that may going to happen probably definitely.

    Consider this a warning... Of a probability... Maybe... Eventually... In theory... I don't know... Could be.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›