So when corrupt preachers rake in tens to hundreds of millions it's tax-exempt because it's not a business, but when a pastor actually cares for the needy like their book says to, that's a crime because it IS a business?
Fuck that worst of both worlds nonsense! 🤬
I just fucking hate this shit, Life is fucking hard. Why go out of your way to make it harder. The D.A. is going to argue some B.S. about how the zoning laws are there to protect people. Fire hazard shit. Ignoring the fact that the pastor was putting people at a very small risk to protect them from a very large risk.
zoning has never been about helping people
If this article was about Joel Osteen and his ilk, "charged for offering shelter" would mean something else in the headline.
So he’s the opposite of Joel Osteen? Sounds good to me.
Zoning laws are bad
Hopefully freedom of religion does something helpful, as the Bible says 40,000 times to home the homeless and feed the hungry.
God that website though... eventually scrolled to a point it threw two interactive ads back to back, filling the screen, preventing me from scrolling. And all the ads were the same, like I saw it already, GOT IT, leave it alone
This title is horribly ambiguous. I thought the pastor was charging money to let people shelter in the church. Instead he was being a good human and allowing people to shelter in the church for free and was charged by the city.
Man I hate zoning laws.
Odds that the DA who decided to charge the pastor is a shitheel republiQan: 99.999%.
Let’s check the board . . .
Another reason not to visit
This is a non-sequiter, given that Milwaukee is nearly 300 miles and three states away from Ohio. It's like, 'eat your vegetables, people are starving in China.'
this isn't just murican. this is super murican. Inception! Incursion!
top 50 comments