Several months before blue strips started floating to the surface of the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool, a company involved in its last renovation more than 15 years ago was approached with an opportunity to do this remodel as well. But the company said no.

Specifically, it balked at two requirements – the Trump administration wanted it done by July 4, and the pool bottom had to be blue, according to two employees with the New Jersey-based Sika Corporation, which provided the concrete construction and sealing products for a 2010 renovation project to the Reflecting Pool.

According to the two employees, who spoke to CNN on the condition they not be identified, both demands made the job “unfeasible.”

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 119 points 1 month ago (4 children)

the time delay made it unfeasible because to paint something - even if it's polyurethane based or epoxy based- you have to dry it out first. otherwise the moisture does bad things. (aka, causes it to not adhere properly.)(aka causes it to flake off.)

It's rather like painting over wet drywall mud.

The "it must be blue" because blue absorbs more light than white- and that caused the massive algae bloom.

But Trump is a moron who can't comprehend just how fucking stupid he is, or that he's not the smartest person in the room; so of course he gave it to his buddy who was happy to do it for a "small" bonus, even though that guy is at least as stupid as Trump is.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    I'd think you'd want the bottom to be black, so that it reflects the surroundings instead of being visible. You say the blue color caused the algae bloom by absorbing more light, is that a temperature thing? I would think absorbing more light would leave less for photosynthesis. I thought the algae bloom was caused by not maintaining the filtration system.

    It's classic Trump, slap a coat of paint on a problem instead of fixing the rot underneath. Change the aesthetics while destroying the purpose of it. I'm just amazed he didn't paint it gold.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 1 month ago

    The impact of the blue (Or any dark ) paint was that it absorbs more radiation from sunlight, increasing the temperature of the water in the pool. It’s this temperature increase which gives rise to the algal bloom. Theoretically painting it black would have been even worse.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    You also usually need special procedures if you can't spray it all in one go. Spraying more solvents on top of bonded coatings will absolutely disrupt the bond. It also might not bond to itself very well.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 86 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Online commentators have also speculated that the bottom of the pool may have been affected by the presence of heavy equipment and trucks — and a presidential motorcade that drove through at one point — shortly after the coating was applied.

    Ravi Kurani, President of Standard Water Corp, an industrial technology company, told CNN he would never recommend driving cars out onto a pool surface, especially when renovations are being done.

    “It’s like you’re putting flooring on your kitchen floor and then you’re take a really heavy tractor on top of it – it’s going to mess it up a little bit.”

    lol

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 51 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Never heard about the motorcade thing until I read the story. That’s not just everyday stupidity - that’s a whole new level of moronic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 50 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    So, in what way is this not a distraction from child rape and mass murder from starting pointless wars (to distract from child rape) ?

    Back to basics ppl, unconscionable abuse and straight up murder, or, a water feature in Washington.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    You can talk about all three just fine. Not only do Republicans love a pedophile, but they also love an incompetent and corrupt pedophile.

    The owner of the Greenwater company is also in the Epstein files so it all ties together nicely.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Yeah I agree that this is a distraction from far more serious shit.

    Unlike many other times when the thing people claim is a distraction is in itself as serious as a heart attack.

    Yet I don't see any "NOW where's the Epstein files" meme here. It's like they purposely only post it in posts about serious issues.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 30 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    could further enflame mounting criticism that the project was rushed and potentially improperly completed.

    Potentially?

    We were promised a result that "will last for at least 50 years" and "if you had a knife, you couldn't even cut it" that didn't make it a month. This situation is my current litmus test to determine if I'm interacting with a propaganda bot or not. This job being improperly completed is potentially the most certain fact in the news today.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 18 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Probably objected to the requirement to kick back half the project's funding to Trump.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Trump probably has all the kickback he needs from the Iran deal.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    The point of a game of monopoly isn't to have a comfortable cushion of cash, the point is to drive everyone else into abject poverty and own the board.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Even so, part of $14m is a rounding error after his other grifting. Doesn't quite compare to bouncing the stock market every other week or the $300b Iran deal or the bribe lawsuits that the media companies had to get the judge to not dismiss so they could "settle".

    Imagine begging a judge to not let you win a case.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Sika Corp. did not reply to CNN’s request for comment.

    They (wisely) turned down the job, so why would they comment now? Why did CNN even ask? I’m sure that whoever made the ultimate decision to pass on Trump’s little fiasco is smiling.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    A responsible journalist would be happier if Sika agreed with the other side’s quoting of them. We currently only have the retelling of a conversation from one of the two parties. It’s a pretty credible retelling of the conversation, but we can’t be sure unless both parties agree thats how the conversation went.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago

    If they mean this Sika, turning it down for feasibility concerns, means it’s not feasible.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Ironically, the only solution may be to drain the swamp and start over?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago

    Wait, people were driving on the reflecting pool just after the bottom was painted blue?

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago*

    His upcoming appearance in front of the pool (because milli vanili canceled and are dead) will be at 9pm for... important secret president reasons.

    Also just unrelated fact to share because I like to be helpful, sunset time in Washington, D.C. on July 4, 2026 is 8:34 PM.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›