all 38 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 5 points 3 years ago (1 child)

Slight inaccuracy, the data only goes back to 1979 and has not yet been verified by NOAA which has data going back to 1880.

It’s also worth noting that this is based on the Climate Reanalyzer which is intended for forecasting temperatures, not record keeping.

It would be more accurate to say it was the hottest day ever recorded by the Climate Reanalyzer.

Source: https://time.com/6292103/worlds-hottest-day-preliminary-record/

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago

    This. It's also not accurate to say it's the warmest we've been in the past 10,000 years, it was likely warmer during the roman warm period, and potentially a couple of other points. So we can only really say it's the warmest we've seen in the last couple hundred years.

    That's not to say this isn't concerning, we're on track to smash the roman warm periods average temperatures within our lifetimes and make the earth the hottest it's been since the paleoscene, which would have massive ramifications. But we're not there yet, the problem is that we will likely get there in the next few decades.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Welcome to the coldest summer for the rest of your life :)

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (2 children)

    I think, as individuals; we all need to pick up our game and do our part in polluting and destroying the planet more. We can't let the corporations do all the heavy lifting after all.

    Edit: I don't think I came across properly here, given the replies. This was sarcasm saying we need to fuck up the planet more to keep pace with the rate the corporations do.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Yes. Our 12% will really make a difference vs corporations' 80%. And we can get to that 12% if so 8 billion of us work together. I'm doing my 0.0000001% part!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Honestly corporations are only producing what consume. We are using corporations as scapegoats. If we don't realize this soon and don't change it ways...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -8 points 3 years ago

    If you haven't seen it, The Good Place is a great show and they discuss this basically. Should we be responsible for tracking the output of every company before we buy any product?

    (The answer is: of course not. We don't have enough time in the world for that. The correct solution is regulation and taxing for negative externalities during the production process. If the cost of negative externalities is built into the cost of the product, then it will be less benificial to purchase a product with a dirty supply chain.)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago

    Don't just single out meat. All of industrialized agriculture is massively carbon and energy intensive and built on gradual topsoil depletion.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago

    The company I work for makes power infrastructure for data centres and the like, 3 phase 400v conductors, the smallest we make is 1000 amp rated and we go up to 6000 amp rated, that is a hell of a lot of power and we run 24 hours a day 7 days a week pumping out miles of these to power the data centres that run the internet so we can be shitty to each other

  • source
  • [+] 1 point 3 years ago
    [–] 1 point 3 years ago

    Curious: how do they know that? Recorded history is like 5k years right?

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (2 children)

    And just a week ago I was talking to these boomers that were explaining me how "we should all stop being so attached to climate fear" and that "everything will just sort itself out and we'll live just fine".

    Yea, no shit boomer

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)

    Boomers: "We had hot days in the 60's and 70's as well and you didn't hear us complain"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago

    My parents' go-to is that everyone was freaking out about an incoming ice age in the 60s (they weren't), and thus climate experts are all completely clueless and have no clue what they're talking about.

    And they wonder why I visit less than before.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    They meant that they'll live just fine. You see, they will be dead before climate change decimates our planet. 🤷‍♂️

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • It won't decimate the planet, but it will make the planet a lot less habitable for humans.

    So yes depending on where they live they will be just fine, but a lot of people will die. Because of this there will be huge migrations and struggels with having enough resources...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Thanks humanity, I'm sure that this will cause no long term issues and we can just keep using the same economic and political systems while not worrying about it at all.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    My fault. I like plastic straws in my scorpion bowls.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Shipping? Shipping is about 2 % of global CO2 emissions.

    Large ships emit a lot of sulphur oxides (SOx). E.g. cruise ships emit more than all cars of Europe. SOx is not a greenhouse gas, but it’s a nasty pollutant nonetheless.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago* (1 child)

    They emit a lot, but they transport ... a very lot. Trucks are higher emitters per comodity.

    Still both should be powered by something else like hydrogen (more interesting for ships I guess) or batteries...

    And cruise ships should be IMHO taxed so high (the tax should probably directly go to countermeasures), such that only very rich people are able to (not that I grant them the fun, but they should finance this climate disaster in every possible way...)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Based on what a reasonable carbon price should be, I don't think you would need to tax them to oblivion. They would just need to pay their fair share.

    This website suggests that it is about 0.4 tonne of CO2 per passenger per day. Canada's current carbon tax is $65 per tonne. So a 7 day cruise would be $182 per passenger in carbon pricing. This is just ballpark and yes you can argue that carbon prices should be higher.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    We are quickly arriving at an unpayable bill.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago

    For whom though? I think if your product is going to be very expensive because of that you,ll try to find ways (less carbon emissive) to make it cheaper, and for others, who have low emissions already, they get an advantage. Also rich people generally emit much more carbon than poor people.

    I'm a little bit tired of the argument, that everything gets expensive, like the money just goes to nirvana, it's a tax and a tax should steer industries (mostly) to do the right thing (in this case emit less CO2). The money can go directly to people e.g. in the form of a universal basic income.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago

    Chat, is that true?!

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago

    OK, now point me to the place I can give money for the food that doesn't pollute/throw it all away.

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago

    Surprised by the casual climate change deniers in here. “Oh, but the data….”

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Don't worry all of this will soon be over.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago

    I guess this is supposed to be taken as a bleak joke but it won't be over soon. We all will likely experience a direct hit to our quality of life. If you're poor, your survival will get harder. If you have or want children they will have fundamentally worse lives, compared to what we experienced so far. This can go on for decades or centuries, depending on how much we can stsill fix and what tipping points occur.

    So yeah, hope that is some motivation to change something. Or at least shout at some people. :)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] -1 points 3 years ago

    Shout out to all of us who buy anything shipped, any petroleum or oil-based products and those of us who aren’t vegan

  • source
  • [–] -1 points 3 years ago

    bullshit, we should be ensure that the countries where a lot of childeren are being bourne, are being economicly lifted... you cannot tell people to have less childeren, if their future depends on it.

  • source
  • [+] -8 points 3 years ago