all 5 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 22 points 3 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago

    It’s not that blast furnaces were unsustainable, it was that no-one wanted to order their steel. Unlike arc furnaces, blast furnaces are destroyed by the act of turning them off. As the government wanted a UK source of steel for military strategic reasons (but not the steel itself while cheaper imports were available) they were paying to keep the furnaces idling at a cost of £400k per day.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    So we've just bought a failing company? That doesn't sound good.

    So I get that steel making might be a strategic national capability that we need to maintain, but is the government going to put the necessary investment into it? They seem incapable of investing in anything.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    This should be an argument for a minimum basic income, as these thousands of people are effectively being paid by the state to sit at home because British Steel has no orders on the books.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments