top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 47 points 3 months ago* (120 children)

Also "free speech" that doesn't apply to corporate platforms. Which is, you know, all of them. Love when a liberal says "that doesn't count, they're a private business" whenever you point out the blatant censorship in the West.

  • source
  • hideshow 122 child comments
  • load more comments (118 replies)
    [–] 19 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Also, all those brands of shampoo are owned by one or two firms.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago

    I've just realized that this is much like having multiple identities.

    A way to deceive market reputation mechanisms.

    Should be made illegal, there should be one main brand seen on everything, then whatever secondary brand they want is possible, but you should clearly see that those 3 niche-optimized goods are from one corp.

    So that the choice were, eh, real.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    Which shareholders are majority Black Rock and Vanguard group so it doesn't matter what company because they have the same owners anyway and that goes for 90% of all publicly traded companies globally so yeah

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 3 months ago

    Not “somehow”. Quite easily. Advertising works. People are easily influenced. It wasn’t sudden; it happened little by little over a long time.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 3 months ago

    Freedom is when toothbrush.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 3 months ago

    "Ha nice try! That is not real capitalism! You think workplaces would just give workers health insurance under a free market? They would just tell sick workers to figure it out themselves and replace them with healthy ones if needed!"

    "Some of the first evidence of compulsory health insurance in the United States was in 1915, through the progressive reform protecting workers against medical costs and sicknesses in industrial America. Prior to this, within the Socialist and Progressive parties, health insurance and coverage was framed as not only an economic right for workers' health, but also as an employer's responsibility and liability—healthcare was in this context centered on working-class Americans and labor unions." (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_insurance_in_the_United_States#The_rise_of_employer-sponsored_coverage)

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›