all 16 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [S] 11 points 3 months ago (1 child)

For those who don't understand what the interceptors are actually for: www.youtube.com/shorts/uIB28MBDujw

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 3 months ago (1 child)
  • [+] -2 points 3 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 16 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    The point is pretending that the "iron dome" is meant to protect civilians and not military assets.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

    That makes her statement worse not better. Now she's framing it like she supports "innocent civilians" dying instead of Israel using interceptors to protect their military bases which is the primary target of the resistance.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -11 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Eh, two things can be true.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 3 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] -4 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Unless iron dome is being used explicitly to prevent attacks on military targets while allowing attacks on civilian targets, that’s just not the case.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago (1 child)
  • [+] -6 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Look, I can explain it to you, but I can’t understand it for you. Have a good day.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments