top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 225 points 5 months ago (7 children)

Time to start looking up every white-ass right-wing voter in the state that has a second home or spends early November out of state this year and challenge their registration 91 days before the 2028 election.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 61 points 5 months ago (8 children)

    wait'll white people start claiming indigenous people aren't citizens.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 103 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    You’re too late. ICE has already arrested people with Native American IDs, claiming they are invalid.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 63 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    ICE has arrested people with valid REAL-IDs claiming they aren't real. They'll do whatever they want to whoever they want.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

    REAL-IDs

    Are Native American IDs not real?

    ETA: Reading this back, it looks really pas-ag. Not American, the question is sincere. I've never heard of Native American IDs

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 5 months ago

    REAL-ID is a new-ish standard required to obtain a driver's license or personal ID. It requires more documentation than was previously required. Native American IDs are real, but REAL-ID is not related.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • [–] 41 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    That would be hilarious. Just start challenging anyone and everyone with a MAGAt sticker just before the election and lock them all down in pointless bureaucracy of proving their citizenship

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 5 months ago*

    Liberals love to pretend the law is self-enforcing and refuse to ask what role the state's deeply racist and violent state bureaucrats, or the police and sheriff's offices (nevermind any ICE agents operating in the state) will play.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Eagle_Eye_(United_States)

    Incidentally, Supreme Court Justice William Renquist started his career as a poll-watcher in Arizona, screening out any who looked too Democrat.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 107 points 5 months ago

    So they added pvp to voting

  • source
  • [–] 85 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Republican Gov. Larry Rhoden signed legislation into law last week that authorizes challenges by individuals and election officials.

    It would be a terrible shame if a bunch of people started challenging Larry's citizenship.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 75 points 5 months ago* (3 children)

    Not being from the US, I was flabbergasted when I learned how voting laws are working there. Where I live we're all automatically registered by the government. They send a card with your name and your address. If there is an error, or if people don't get a card, they can manually register or correct the error. And we all stay registered unless we move or there is an error. That's it.

    I'm in my mid life and had to register once in my 20ies because I moved a lot. Otherwise the government just automatically registers me. Nobody can challenge that except the election's office. They decide who meets the requirements to vote or not. Not some random conservative asshole that thinks people are not white enough. Democracy in the US seems like a joke.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 5 months ago (6 children)

    In Canada we have the same thing. You can every year when filling taxes tick off a box to update your voter info to save you the work. You also can register at the voting booth with ID, or proof of residence, or the statement of a registered voter in the area willing to vouch for you.

    Basically zero voter fraud.

    Voter ID and registration laws are pure voter suppression!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • [–] 36 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    So when they receive a complaint about every non-Republican voter, are they going to say that there is a 2 year backlog on paperwork, so these people will have to skip this election?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 5 months ago

    Nope, that is not democracy

  • source
  • [–] 32 points 5 months ago

    South Dakota? Home of Kristi Noem? UNBELIEVABLE!!!

  • source
  • [–] 32 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    I fucking hate my country now

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 5 months ago*

    Probably the most not-the-onion headline I've ever read. My brain keeps trying to illustrate it as comedy to explain it to myself in my mind.

    My brain's conclusion?

    Jesus fucking Christ, I'm so tired.

  • source
  • [–] 26 points 5 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 23 points 5 months ago

    “How could this go wrong?” Said absolutely no one.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 5 months ago

    Soooo...every reservation gonna challenge every South Dakotane citizenship?

    God I hope so.

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 5 months ago* (2 children)

    Conservatives clearly hate our Constitution. So why don't they secede? Seems like something they'd be into. They even whine about it from time to time.

    The answer is because their failing red states require our blue states to exist.

    This is an abusive relationship and it's high time we end it. We do not need them. They need us.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 19 points 5 months ago

    How else are you going to legally bully and intimidate voters?

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Good now challenge citizenship of all white ppl

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    Oh, that could be fun. After voting, myself, I'd form a line of like minded folks to pick out likely MAGAS and challenge each multiple times.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 18 points 5 months ago

    gonna be shocked when all the people challenged aren't white while all the people challenging are.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 5 months ago

    State law already allows challenges to a voter’s registration up to the 90th day before an election, if a person is suspected of lacking South Dakota residency, voting in another state or being registered to vote in another state. The new law adds citizenship as a justification for a challenge.

    Challenges may be filed by the South Dakota Secretary of State’s Office, the auditor in the county where the voter is registered, or a voter in the same county. The challenge must be in the form of a signed, sworn statement and must include what the law describes as “documented evidence.”

    So the "challenge" this already exists but citizenship is being added as another reason. I wonder what the requirements for evidence are or if some county officials will call the sworn statement itself "documented evidence."

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 5 months ago

    There's a New South Dakota?

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago

    Reunite the Dakotas!

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago

    So are there any pro-boner lawyers looking to challenge as many white people as they can?

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›