top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 239 points 5 months ago (7 children)

Do I want another option in the desktop CPU space? YES

Do I want that option to be Nvidia? NOPE

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    I'm looking forward to the MilkV chipsets that are RISC V architecture. They have like a microATX board that just takes regular computer components and has functioning graphics drivers for AMD. Nothing is optimized for it but its a 64 core CPU if I recall correctly, and its ridiculously low wattage for what it does.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 180 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    They should try entering the desktop GPU market.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 53 points 5 months ago

    If it ever becomes the standard desktop processor, they'll pull the rug like they have with graphics processors and push everything to AI datacenters.

    Hard pass

  • source
  • [–] 42 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    Are they hedging against AI collapsing? Not sure I see the motivation.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    I think that's 100% what this is, and it's a very smart play if that's the case. Intel are reeling from some significant setbacks, while Nvidia is swimming in cash. There's never been a better time for them to make a play for the desktop CPU space.

    And they've got absolutely no illusions about what's happening with AI. They're the ones who are literally paying AI companies to buy their chips. They know the space is collapsing. But as the guys selling the picks and shovels, they can ride out that collapse if they're smart.

    End of the day, if what we get out of this is a new, serious competitor in the CPU space, that'll at least be some kind of win. With Nvidia's money and expertise they could really force Intel to get their shit together. AMD chasing their heels is the only that's ever kept them from completely going to shit, but more competition is even better. With all three major companies playing in both the CPU and GPU spaces, that could be really good for consumers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago

    Nvidia wants to be the equal to Intel and AMD. They want to be the 3rd major hardware house.

    In ~2009, Intel didn’t renew a contract which allowed Nvidia to produce chipsets for Intel processors, and since then Nvidia has wanted a CPU of their own to keep from getting locked out again.

    Nvidia tried to buy Arm when SoftBank was trying to sell, but that got scuttled. They had Tegra in the past which was a phone processor and successful in the Nintendo Switch. They can’t buy Intel because of poison pills in the x86 licensing between AMD and Intel which would kick in.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 34 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    I don’t think I’ll ever purchase anything made by NVIDIA

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 5 months ago* (3 children)

    clock speed of 4GHz, which is far below AMD and Intel's 5GHz.

    phrasing is odd. 25% lower clock speed isnt “far below”

    but also fuck nvidia

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    I don't think it should even be comparable between totally different architectures.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 5 months ago

    Yeah, we've been through this exact same game with multiple iterations of Intel and AMD chips. When AMD first started doing consumer CPUs they badged them according to their equivalent Intel clock speed because one to one comparisons were misleading.

    What's the L1 and L2 cache? What are the bus speeds? How many cores and how are they architectured? Multi-threading? How many steps is the instruction cycle? There are so many factors beyond just clock speed that play into real world performance.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 13 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    25% lower clock speed isnt “far below”

    AHEM! AKTCHEWALEE..... it's 20% which is even less qualified to be "far below" the other two.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

    Does it work without ram?

    Edit- removed "and"

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 24 points 5 months ago

    I'm not buying this news, and if I'm wrong I'm not buying the product. Fuck Nvidia

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 5 months ago

    Good, I won't be buying them either.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    I will not buy another nvidia retail product again. Could make an exception for a second hand shield from an earlier generation, but nvidia is dead to me. AMD is my new best friend.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 5 months ago

    Let me guess, it won't work with Linux once so ever without a propetairy nvidia kernel

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Yeah, but, it's Nvidia, the same company who's a key figure on the AI-Govt circlejerk.

    The absolute best thing we can do is boycott them AND OpenAI, because neither company gives a F about the People.

    While Huang and Nvidia continue their current trajectory, I'll never buy another Nvidia product.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 15 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    This is more about the Arm X925 core than about Nvidia. The X925 is a new superscalar ARM core that's the first one competitive with current x64 at single threaded compute.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [+] 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
    [–] 11 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    I am literally just waiting for China to catch up and knock over all 3 of these TSMC suckers.

    I don't care if they throw a 2000% tarrif on it, I will figure out a way to bypass it so I can enjoy pre inflation PC prices again when high end GPUs were going for $300, SSDs became so cheap that the HDD market actually started falling behind, and you could chuck RAM sticks around like spare change.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 10 points 5 months ago

    Yeah I think I'd rather stick a CPU up my ass then use a Nvidia CPU an any computer I own.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 5 months ago

    Maybe they should start making RAM /s

  • source
  • [+] 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)
    [–] 8 points 5 months ago

    so... they have spare production capacity then?

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 5 months ago

    I mean, of course they could.

    But where's the money in that?

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago

    Big lol. I'll believe it when I see benchmarks.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago

    A lot of companies could do stuff. We know it'd all go to AI slop anyway, so whatever.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    if they don't tank on AI first.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 4 points 5 months ago

    kindly nationalize nvidia now

    thank you

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago (2 children)
    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 4 points 5 months ago

    well they start making decent drivers for linux or will they suck ass like they do now

  • source
  • [+] 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›