all 21 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 28 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Was self-hosting gitlab or foregejo not an option?

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    They’ll probably just fork forgejo add some slight “ai agentic” bullshit and market it as their own product.

    I was going to say hopefully the forgejo licence doesn’t allow that but then again, OpenAI have shown they don’t really care about copyright or anything like that

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Forgejo is licensed under GPLv3, so I think it isn't possible to do so

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago

    Correct me if I wrong, but the GPL has the weakpoint of web distribution in the sense that a backend is not shipped to the client, so you can keep a forked GPL product without publishing back. The AGPL was made for this (and the SSPL (I think) is like any network interface needed should be published too).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 5 months ago

    "What could be worse than MICROSOFT overseeing open source software? Wait no! It was a rhetorical question!"

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Why? Seems like a massive waste of resources. We already have several source controls

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago (1 child)
  • [+] 11 points 5 months ago
    [–] 7 points 5 months ago
    [–] 7 points 5 months ago

    I hope they call it "SlopTrough"

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    this is used to scrape people code to train model. In recent times github restrict repo access without login so they maybe making own git platform.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago