all 9 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 31 points 6 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 19 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Theocracy is theocracy. Which is not good or terribly useful or even stable as a system. But it is not fascism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 6 months ago* (1 child)

    It's fair to say that not all theocratic systems are fascist, but they're also not mutually exclusive. A particular theocratic system can also be fascist in nature.

    Some common points:

    • Appeal to tradition
    • Rejection of modernism
    • Anti-intellectualism
    • Absolute factual authority of leaders
    • Obsession with outgroups as enemies, such as sinners and atheists and believers of other faiths
    • Special jargon to control the masses
    • Subordination of people to a greater cause
    • Jingoist militarism (ironic for a lot of "peaceful" religions)
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 6 months ago

    These misinformed peoples think that only they can make the necessary decisions to save us all. I don't want to be saved, I want reasonable prices groceries and a decent wage. It should be a crime to call what these people do "Christianity"

  • source
  • [+] 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)
    [–] 5 points 6 months ago

    They know, they can't win in any environment that doesn't favor their flavor of mythology.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago

    Not only would this change the state constitution to favor Christianity, the language specifically calls out evangelicals. So most Catholics and Episcopalians would also be in trouble.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago

    "New Hampshire" "Republicans" Tautology.

    I'm reminded every day how much of an armpit NH really is.

  • source