▲ 101 ▼ Journalism Is a Public Good and Should Be Publicly Funded (www.scientificamerican.com) submitted 3 years ago by DeadWorld@lemm.ee [M] to c/brainworms@lemm.ee 9 comments fedilink hide all child comments cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/2930440 Scientific American
[–] rebul@kbin.social 5 points 3 years ago (3 children) Ridiculous. Publicly funded means propaganda for the state. It's a No for me, dawg. permalink fedilink source hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] phillaholic@lemm.ee 5 points 3 years ago (1 child) Plenty of private companies get public funding and say and do whatever they want. We already have PBS and NPR, we should just increase their budgets. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rebul@kbin.social -3 points 3 years ago (1 child) I disagree. PBS and NPR have deep political biases in their programming. Either remove the biases, or scrap the programs. I don't need entities telling me how to think, I will review facts and come to my own conclusions. As for private companies that get public funding...that's a bit vague, so I can't comment on that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] phillaholic@lemm.ee 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) If you think NPR and PBS have deep political biases you aren’t reviewing the facts correctly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rebul@kbin.social -2 points 3 years ago If you think they don't have deep political biases, you need to step out of your echo chamber and breathe some fresh air. permalink fedilink source parent [–] nkiru@lemm.ee 3 points 3 years ago* Agree with this, too. The very reason why it used to work was because of the notion and protection of "the free press." Now that competition in journalism is so fierce, surprisingly, the quality has gone down, not up, as one might expect. Some may disagree with this, but it's the way I see it. When I read an article from a journalist, it's either very shallow, missing answers to some very obvious questions, or it's heavily opinionated with regard to politics. Or all three! You may or may not agree, but that's my experience and opinion thus far. permalink fedilink source parent [+] Soundhole@lemm.ee 3 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rebul@kbin.social 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) I think journalism is struggling because of pandering to political affiliations; Fox News to the Conservatives, Everyone else to the Liberals. Each is alienating a large readership base (and certain advertising corporations) unnecessarily. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] nkiru@lemm.ee 3 points 3 years ago* (1 child) I completely agree. Reminds me of regulatory capture in a way. Whatever kept journalists honest, non-biased, and integrity-filled has disappeared. Is there any way to fix it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rebul@kbin.social 1 point 3 years ago I don't know how to fix it. I used to think Social Media was the answer; getting information from non legacy sources. Instead, it just creates deeper echo chambers and people grow further apart. Conservatives call their opponents Woke Socialists, Liberals label everyone that disagrees with them Nazis/Fascists. We need some grownups in the room. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] phillaholic@lemm.ee 5 points 3 years ago (1 child) Plenty of private companies get public funding and say and do whatever they want. We already have PBS and NPR, we should just increase their budgets. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rebul@kbin.social -3 points 3 years ago (1 child) I disagree. PBS and NPR have deep political biases in their programming. Either remove the biases, or scrap the programs. I don't need entities telling me how to think, I will review facts and come to my own conclusions. As for private companies that get public funding...that's a bit vague, so I can't comment on that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] phillaholic@lemm.ee 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) If you think NPR and PBS have deep political biases you aren’t reviewing the facts correctly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rebul@kbin.social -2 points 3 years ago If you think they don't have deep political biases, you need to step out of your echo chamber and breathe some fresh air. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] rebul@kbin.social -3 points 3 years ago (1 child) I disagree. PBS and NPR have deep political biases in their programming. Either remove the biases, or scrap the programs. I don't need entities telling me how to think, I will review facts and come to my own conclusions. As for private companies that get public funding...that's a bit vague, so I can't comment on that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] phillaholic@lemm.ee 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) If you think NPR and PBS have deep political biases you aren’t reviewing the facts correctly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rebul@kbin.social -2 points 3 years ago If you think they don't have deep political biases, you need to step out of your echo chamber and breathe some fresh air. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] phillaholic@lemm.ee 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) If you think NPR and PBS have deep political biases you aren’t reviewing the facts correctly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rebul@kbin.social -2 points 3 years ago If you think they don't have deep political biases, you need to step out of your echo chamber and breathe some fresh air. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] rebul@kbin.social -2 points 3 years ago If you think they don't have deep political biases, you need to step out of your echo chamber and breathe some fresh air. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] nkiru@lemm.ee 3 points 3 years ago* Agree with this, too. The very reason why it used to work was because of the notion and protection of "the free press." Now that competition in journalism is so fierce, surprisingly, the quality has gone down, not up, as one might expect. Some may disagree with this, but it's the way I see it. When I read an article from a journalist, it's either very shallow, missing answers to some very obvious questions, or it's heavily opinionated with regard to politics. Or all three! You may or may not agree, but that's my experience and opinion thus far. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Soundhole@lemm.ee 3 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rebul@kbin.social 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) I think journalism is struggling because of pandering to political affiliations; Fox News to the Conservatives, Everyone else to the Liberals. Each is alienating a large readership base (and certain advertising corporations) unnecessarily. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] nkiru@lemm.ee 3 points 3 years ago* (1 child) I completely agree. Reminds me of regulatory capture in a way. Whatever kept journalists honest, non-biased, and integrity-filled has disappeared. Is there any way to fix it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rebul@kbin.social 1 point 3 years ago I don't know how to fix it. I used to think Social Media was the answer; getting information from non legacy sources. Instead, it just creates deeper echo chambers and people grow further apart. Conservatives call their opponents Woke Socialists, Liberals label everyone that disagrees with them Nazis/Fascists. We need some grownups in the room. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] rebul@kbin.social 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) I think journalism is struggling because of pandering to political affiliations; Fox News to the Conservatives, Everyone else to the Liberals. Each is alienating a large readership base (and certain advertising corporations) unnecessarily. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] nkiru@lemm.ee 3 points 3 years ago* (1 child) I completely agree. Reminds me of regulatory capture in a way. Whatever kept journalists honest, non-biased, and integrity-filled has disappeared. Is there any way to fix it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rebul@kbin.social 1 point 3 years ago I don't know how to fix it. I used to think Social Media was the answer; getting information from non legacy sources. Instead, it just creates deeper echo chambers and people grow further apart. Conservatives call their opponents Woke Socialists, Liberals label everyone that disagrees with them Nazis/Fascists. We need some grownups in the room. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] nkiru@lemm.ee 3 points 3 years ago* (1 child) I completely agree. Reminds me of regulatory capture in a way. Whatever kept journalists honest, non-biased, and integrity-filled has disappeared. Is there any way to fix it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rebul@kbin.social 1 point 3 years ago I don't know how to fix it. I used to think Social Media was the answer; getting information from non legacy sources. Instead, it just creates deeper echo chambers and people grow further apart. Conservatives call their opponents Woke Socialists, Liberals label everyone that disagrees with them Nazis/Fascists. We need some grownups in the room. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] rebul@kbin.social 1 point 3 years ago I don't know how to fix it. I used to think Social Media was the answer; getting information from non legacy sources. Instead, it just creates deeper echo chambers and people grow further apart. Conservatives call their opponents Woke Socialists, Liberals label everyone that disagrees with them Nazis/Fascists. We need some grownups in the room. permalink fedilink source parent
all 10 comments