Meta threads will open federation to the fediverse soon, and while this is mainly to mastodon it will still affect lemmy. They are acting like they won't be evil, but let's be real this is Facebook when have they ever done that.

This article which has been trending lately explains some of the issues. https://ploum.net/2023-06-23-how-to-kill-decentralised-networks.html

This comment here is a simple analogy if you can't be bothered reading the article. https://lemmy.ca/comment/5702922

@lodion@aussie.zone

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 82 points 2 years ago

Meta is a cancer, there is no benefit to the company being given any access to this instance.

  • source
  • [–] 50 points 2 years ago (10 children)

    There is nothing to gain from interaction with Meta/Threads

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • load more comments (10 replies)
    [–] 30 points 2 years ago

    Meta don't deserve any chances, I'm here to get away from that toxic bull and would much prefer it to be blocked from any instance I interact with.

  • source
  • [–] 26 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Here's my not-at-all-qualified take:

    Let the federation ride. If Threads users add meaningful content and activity, then cool.

    But the second we see a Meta ad, pull that fucking plug. We should not be distributing their ads for free (or at all).

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    Yeah but you might have it in reverse. Meta would benefit from lemmy users providing original content. It would basically suck the life out of the smaller instances and people would have no incentive to stick with apps or instances made by the little guys. If Meta started serving ads and we pulled out, it wouldn't mean much. By then, Meta might have adopted most users - all the while stealing our content.

    ^ Super hypothetical. I'm not a federation expert. But it sounds like that could happen.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I don't think lemmy and mastodon are big enough for meta to care about stealing our content.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    I think you'd be surprised at how few people make OC for the internet and how those brains operate. I know I'm not porting my content bot over to threads anytime soon. He's very happy on mastodon and writes frequently.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 23 points 2 years ago

    When I last looked at the defederations of some Mastodon servers, everyone was already blocking Threads. This was a year ago. Instances running Lemmy and Kbin and like should probably do the same.

  • source
  • [+] 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
    [–] 13 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Fully agreed, anyone who doesn't either works for Meta or can't see the writing on the wall about what this will do to the fediverse.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 12 points 2 years ago

    I'll be blocking it the first time it shows up on my feed anyway.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Unfortunately, as much as I like Lemmy. It's kind of stuck in a catch-22 situation.

    The bigger it grows the more likely it is to be destroyed by "bad actors"

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago

    I presume this will be the case, but don’t think there’s been any official announcement yet. The majority of current servers have planned to resist by defederating.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago

    So this means I'll be seeing what people post on threads in my lemmy app?

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I don't quite understand, would it be harder to defederate later, once they start becoming evil? Lemmy and Mastodon were founded to actively distance ourselves from the likes of Twitter and Reddit. We're not here because it's the only option we have or because we're creating a whole new system. We're here because we chose to and decide that we could live without relying on those big corporations. Surely, people here are more willing to give Meta the middle finger and wouldn't mind blocking Threads if that ever happened right?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 7 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    This seems like a very important discussion but let me tell you how I came across it. It's possible many others on Aussie Zone fall into a similar boat as mine. If not please ignore.

    I only use Voyager to interact with Lemmy regularly. Occasionally I check out Aussie Zone via a browser but that's very rare.

    I think the 'Default feed' for Voyager is 'Home' which are the coms I've subbed to. I didn't even know what 'Local' was until I looked it up just now (while trying to find out if Voyager can list all the coms of an instance like the coms page in a desktop browser, which I don't think it does).

    So I was surprised not to see this discussion earlier after seeing it pop up more broadly across the lemmyverse. Turns out that's because I never selected the Local feed to see what everyone is talking about and because I wasn't subbed to Meta (as in the Aussie Zone com, not the company) until now.

    If my ignorance is unusual for Aussie Zone folk then please ignore this comment. If it's possible that lots of other active or semi-active local users are not seeing this discussion is there any way to highlight it across the instance?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 6 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    This elitism bandwagoning hurts the goal of providing alternatives to closed source proprietary platforms for social media.

    If you want an open and viable alternative to proprietary platforms running social media then you must have a willingness to include those who want to be part of said platforms.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [+] 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)
    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    Forgive my newbness, but is it up to instance owners to defederate? Or individual users? I don’t really know how it works.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›