Title. :)

all 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 35 points 2 years ago (2 children)

If there is one thing you shouldn't cheap out on imo it's the storage.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    There is probably some iron triangle to be found there; cheap, large capacity ,reliable ; chose two.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    You can have all three of those, but you won't get great performance. The Samsung QVO SATA drives are a great example. I wouldn't use those for an OS drive but they're fantastic for NAS or media use.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Personally I have focused on fast SSD storage and utilized the vast, cheap, slow storage available with mechanical drives for backup.

    At the end of the day, if an SSD fails, you're effectively just screwed. If a mechanical drive fails, there is some possibility that the data is recoverable. But moreover, mechanical storage is so cheap by volume that you can just have redundant backup and never worry about it, really.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I thought that SSD fails “better” than HDD because SDD become read-only first.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    The point is to run TLC drives. SLC drives of that capacity are too expensive and are thus not recommended.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)
    • SLC -> Single-Level Cell, i.e. 1 bit per cell
    • MLC -> Multi-Level Cell, i.e. 2 bits per cell
    • TLC -> Triple-Level Cell, i.e. 3 bits per cell
    • QLC -> Quad-Level Cell, i.e. 4 bits per cell

    The more bits per cell you store, the more dense and therefore cheaper your flash chips can be for a give capacity. The downside is that it is slower and less reliable since you have to be able to write and read exponentially more voltage states per cell, e.g. 2 states for SLC, 4 states for MLC, 8 states for TLC, etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    WD Green /shrug

    I’ve been using all Red Pros since I first built my nas, but it started with a couple of green 2TB that where in there for like 7 years before being replaced (didn’t die yet)

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago*

    Same, we're ones of dozens I'm sure but I've been running a mix of WD greens and Seagate barracudas in a hardware RAID5 array for over a decade. Only had 2 drive failures over the entire time with no data loss. But yeah... would advise against that if possible

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Your local network is probably 1Gbit or 2.5Gbits so you’ll be good with SATA as an aux drive, say a Samsung 870 QVO. I’d recommend running a smaller NMVe as your main one.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Or even USB 3+, should that be cheaper.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    Transcend ssd220s (4tb SATA) can be found for really nice prices.
    Even had a thread about this one on Lemmy cuz I wasn't sure how good it is (it's great).

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    Perhaps running a mirror or a stripe array would be more important than selecting drives that don't fail. Then you can pick whatever that's not complete garbage. That said, it would likely still be more expensive overall.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    A SATA ADATA SU800 died on me after 4 years of use. (Luckily I had a weekly harddrive backup so I lost almost nothing! :D)

    Samsung, WD, Lexar, Kingston generally are known reliable name brands (but Samsung warranty doesn't work well in Canada). If you watch !bapcsalescanada@lemmy.ca like a hawk (Canada's PC part sales mirrored from Reddit) you may find the occasional deal that is at or under $50/TB Canadian (roughly 36 US$, 35€)

    E:I noticed it hasn't posted in a couple days, wonder if it died or got banned

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Been using Sabrent Rocket SSDs for awhile. Been reliable and fast. They aren't the cheapest SSDs, but they perform well and don't break the bank.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    Used enterprise SSDs is what I'm running, bit of work to filter down the results on eBay though.

  • source
  • [–] [B] 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I've seen in this thread:

    Fewer Letters More Letters
    NAS Network-Attached Storage
    NVMe Non-Volatile Memory Express interface for mass storage
    RAID Redundant Array of Independent Disks for mass storage
    SATA Serial AT Attachment interface for mass storage
    SSD Solid State Drive mass storage

    5 acronyms in this thread; the most compressed thread commented on today has 15 acronyms.

    [Thread #356 for this sub, first seen 14th Dec 2023, 22:35] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I've been running a couple ADATA Nvme drives since 2019. No issues and they're fast.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    While it doesn't see much use (sporadic), my 'value' Adata nvme drive has been solid and performing as expected in my gaming laptop; also from 2019.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    Running 2x ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro M.2 NVMe, 500Gb for OS and VMs and a 2Tb for games and documents.

    I figured it was worth the gamble on this cheaper brand since everything important is synched/baked up to my server.

    AAANNNDD that server is synched to my old NAS.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    ADATA nVme, SATA m.2 and SATA are my go to for cheap upgrades for laptops and have had no problems with them. Even have a few in external USB cases for large capacity, fast, portable storage and they work great.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    I use enterprise drives because they're cheaper and more reliable.

    Got some 4TB enterprise NVMe for 150 each. They only had 3TB written, basically brand new.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    I've heard good things about the netac n7000, (not the n7000t!), but I have not bit the bullet yet on buying one

  • source
  • [+] 1 point 2 years ago
    [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    buffalo, SanDisk, Samsung have all done me well.

  • source
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago

    New Lemmy Post: Please recommend your cheaper, reliable SSDs 2TB+ (4TB ideal) (https://lemmy.world/post/9575456)
    Tagging: #SelfHosted

    (Replying in the OP of this thread (NOT THIS BOT!) will appear as a comment in the lemmy discussion.)

    I am a FOSS bot. Check my README: https://github.com/db0/lemmy-tagginator/blob/main/README.md

  • source