top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 82 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I hope I dont need to upgrade my Sound Blaster audio card!

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Still rocking my SoundBlaster X-fi Titanium Fatal1ty edition. It’s not necessary, but I have it and it still works, so I may as well use it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 45 points 2 years ago (12 children)

    I'm a bit baffled that some people still use HDDs considering how cheap SSDs have gotten. You can get a 2TB M.2 for around $100. If you've got the specs for new games, there's no excuse.

  • source
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I can get a 10TB HDD for under 250€, and there are some technical advantages. For example, if you have an ssd lying around unpowered, it will lose data much quicker than magnetic storage

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    You run programs or operating systems off that 10 TB HDD?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    The PS4 has an HDD, and only partway through its life upgraded from SATA2 to SATA3 even.

    Personally, I've got my boot drive, plus a 2TB SATA3 SSD for games that benefit from it's plus a 12TB HDD for the vast majority of games that don't need it (or to temporarily store games- it's faster to move them between drives than re-doenload them). So if I was planning on playing this games hearing this from the devs would let me know I need to free up some SSD space.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Games keep getting bigger and bigger. This game is expected to be about 100GB, and that's not uncommon for modern AAA games. The CoD games have been over 200GB for a while now. Previous FF games have been similar size. RDR2 was 120GB.

    I would expect most people playing FF16 on PC to have a small SSD drive with their OS, key programs, and maybe a couple of games, then a HDD for bulk storage.

    I'm not interested in the FF series, but if I was this message from the devs means "clear up some space on your SSD". Which can sometimes be an inconvenience.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    i don't play 'new' games, i don't have the hardware for them. most my gear is older salvaged stuff that didn't cost me anything to get. between constant rent increases and the cost of groceries these days, i simply can't afford to upgrade unless i get lucky and salvage something useful.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    I’m a bit baffled that some people still use HDDs considering how cheap SSDs have gotten. You can get a 2TB M.2 for around $100. If you’ve got the specs for new games, there’s no excuse.

    I don't know why you got some downvotes. Buying an SSD to store the latest games is much more cheaper than buying a GPU. If one already has a powerful GPU, I don't know why they consider an SSD "not affordable"

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    If you’re just buying a terabyte or two of storage there’s absolutely no reason to buy spinning rust at this point. If you want many terabytes of storage 12tb+ hard drives are going to be a fair bit cheaper than SSDs currently. SSDs have been rapidly dropping in price and increasing in capacity, though, so hopefully it just gets more and more cost effective to have a bunch of storage with SSDs.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 29 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    In 2023/4 you should not be running a hdd in your gaming machine anyway, SSDs are so affordable now

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 26 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Oh no, does that mean I have to replace my Radio Shack CTR-41 cassette drive?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I probably also need at least a dual core CPU.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    So what? I accidentally installed Baldur's Gate 3 on a hard disk and it was unplayable, because the assets took ages to load. Transferred everything over to an NVMe drive and it's butter smooth. Just don't put anything that requires interaction on a hard disk and get with the times and plop in an SSD. Best bang for your buck in terms of an upgrade with a massively noticable effect.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago

    Too true. Upgrading to NVMe was the most noticeable speed boost I've experienced all at once in my history of building my own rigs. It's was like black magic. Wouldn't shut up about it to all my friends for a month.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago

    ITT: people bragging about the 32 GB they paid $700 for so Oblivion would load faster.

    If you dropped five grand on a PC a decade ago, yeah, of course you've used SSDs exclusively. Each gigabyte only cost two bucks! Meanwhile, on hard disks: ten cents.

    If you built a PC three years ago, SSDs were finally approaching that ten-cent figure... while HDDs were pushing two cents per gigabyte.

    The gap is closing. The low end for SSDs is trivially affordable, now. Key word: now. There's no reason not to have your OS on SSD, now. And the capacity of spinning plates can only be pushed so far within a 3.5" module. There will be a point where there's no reason to buy new disks. But if I want another dozen terabytes for network storage, like hell I'm gonna pony up for neon-spangled M.2 drives. $200 versus $600... how badly do I need those milliseconds?

  • source
  • this is nothing new... fuck game journalism

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago

    Don't fucking dare me! My fucking magnetic tape drive does the job just fine!

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    Are you telling me I should stop gaming using a raid10 set made from 8x500GB HDDs?

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I haven’t had an HDD since around 2004, maybe 2002. Sure I cant keep tons of big games installed, but decent internet makes that not really an issue.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    What were you storing your stuff on?

    The first reasonable sized consumer ssds I remember were the original ocz line. What was it like onyx or agility? And that wasnt until almost 2010 ish.

    2002 seems suuuuper early.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    That’s super early to have adopted SSDs solely, no?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago* (3 children)

    Yeah it is, and Windows didn’t get TRIM support for SSDs until Windows 7 in 2009.

    The MacBook Air didn’t even get SSDs until 2008, and I believe it was the first mass-produced consumer computer with an SSD. Linux also got support around that time.

    I’m skeptical unless OP’s dad worked somewhere that had enterprise drives to discard… and allowed drives to disappear.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›