all 13 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 35 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

Even if you already know that website, it's worth a click. It seems to me they have updated the story as well.

Seriously, without any conspiracy bullshit - why do governments allow "super rich" to exist? Who benefits? Cui bono?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Because the super rich buy the politicians who write the laws.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    followthemoney.org allows those living in the US to track who is funding their legislators, committees, and individual pieces of legislation. Just in case you want to verify this claim for yourself.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    That's a dead link. Do you know the correct URL?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago

    Thanks, always a good reminder

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago

    Great stuff

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago

    Last time this was posted is how I learned that Jeff bezos, in a single day, earned enough to pay for all the cancer treatments in America for an entire year.

    On an unrelated note..... A few gallons of gas really isn't that expensive.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago

    FUCK that's a powerful way to represent that data. Neat.

  • source
  • TAX THE FUCKING BILLIONAIRES

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago*

    Did they really have to use median income as a reference point? Numbers for median wealth exist. In the US that would be about 108k per household, so it wouldn't look disignificantly different from the 68k (median income) they used, but it would avoid comparing apples and oranges.

  • source