top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 126 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Wouldn't it be better to use all that obsidian to build nether portals so we can build a public transit system on the bedrock roof?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 109 points 2 years ago* (5 children)

    Turns out it'd be a dissapointingly small sphere:

    US annual defence budget = $800 billion

    2% = $16 billion

    Obsidian cost per kg = $5

    Total kg in budget = 3.2 billion kg

    Density of obsidian = 2.6 g/cm3 = 2600 kg/m3

    Total volume of sphere = 3.2b/2600 = 1230769 m3

    Volume of sphere = 4/3 π r^3

    Radius = (3V/4π)^(1/3) = 66.48 m

    The sphere would only stand at 133m tall, I propose we instead utilise the entire defence budget for a much more skyscraper like 490m tall orb

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Well that's assuming it's completely solid and not hollow. Hollow would probably be pretty huge, although the structural rigidity might not be great. Maybe we make a giant obsidian 3D printer and print it at like 10-15% infill.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    An obsidian 3d print is less crazy than you might think. It's essentially rapidly cooled lava.

    Need something to hold the lava, then pressurize it to squeeze it through a nozzle that that has attached cooling units.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 28 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    It would also crack instantly. Obsidian's not durable.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Because Obsidian is really fragile. Maybe a bird hits it by accident, shatters the whole thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 25 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    My only question is why we didn't build the orb back in the Eisenhower administration when it was most needed.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago

    Would be a far better use of the 'defense' budget than what they're currently spending it on.

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Thats funny because more than 2%, more like 40%, of our defense budget is going into a black orb never to be seen again and is completely unaccounted for.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago

    2b2t players:

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Why would it hum and am I taking this too seriously?

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 17 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Just imagine the size we could build if we used all of the defense budget. It's resonant frequency would blow the eardrums of everyone on the West Coast and kill all marine life. One day when I'm presadent...

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 15 points 2 years ago

    Why does the government keep this from us?
    Why are they so afraid of giving the public what they deserve and want, an ominously humming obsidian sphere?
    What if China builds a mysteriously vibrating marble sphere first?
    Were all the plans for this project taken to Mar-a-Lago? Or saved on Hunter Biden's laptop? Or hidden in some pizza restaurant?
    Just asking questions...

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Something one might propose to build in Night Vale.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    Please do not disregard the obsidian sphere in the Night Vale public swimming pool. Make sure to give it all due attention. But not too much attention, so as to make things weird. Too little attention, unfortunately, will also bring about its ire, and we all remember what happened last time. Simply apply the recommended amount of regard to its ominous, strangely comforting hum, as it gently lulls you to sleep.

    And now: the weather.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    In 2022, the defense dept spent 590billion dollars, 2% of that would be 11.8 billion dollars. While it is impossible to calculate the cost of constructing this sphere, it cost 25 billion dollars to develop the Airbus A380, and 150 Billion to complete the International space station.

    The US defense budget isn't an infinite pool of money. It's 15% of the federal budget. It's dwarfed by healthcare spending (27%), and Social Security (24%). I'm not a war hawk, I try to bring this up in lefty spaces because skimming off the defense budget to solve social problems is a common, and silly belief.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_federal_budget#Major_expenditure_categories

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    The military budget is massive, not just because a ton of money gets wasted, but because the US has a large military presence across the entire planet. Even if most of the money goes to waste, that's still enough to outspend every other military on earth. At the same time, SS is a massive project of direct payments to seniors, Medicare is massive and made more expensive by our shitty healthcare system, and US tax rates are low compared to their peak.

    Tons of companies and rich people pay negative overall taxes, even though their activities cause costly externalities to society. More than not paying their fair share, they actually pass off large bills to everyone by not paying the full costs of their business. All because US foreign policy works to spread and maintain global capitalism instead of a rule based world order like they claim, incentivizing countries to offer competitive (low) tax rates. Economic interreliance disincentivizes international wars, but it causes economic suffering that fuels nationalism which incentivizes wars, civil conflict that can turn into civil wars, and undermines democracy in favor of plutocracy. Fucking utopian capitalists.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    Note also absent from the defense spending budget is actual necessary gear for the troopers, such as proper helmets that protect from IED concussions and proper treatment from the DVA for TBI, of which we have hundreds of thousands of cases thanks to twenty years of War on Terror.

    Recruits are entirely expendable, according to how our budgets are allocated, which is one of the primary points of counter-recruitment. Roll a D20 for every year of your term, and on a critical fumble, you either die or, way more likely, sustain a life-ruining wound. And those are the ones they count rather than PTSD cases they send back into the fray, the rape cases they make disappear or the troopers who wash out because a senior officer has a personality conflict with them and deigns to personally make their lives a living hell until they break.

    In my own work with vets, all these stories have been commonplace, not just isolated incidents.

    So yeah, if we're not going to treat our troops like human beings worthy of life, we can assume defense dollars are going to the cigars that Lockheed-Martin lobbyists hand out to our Senators to celebrate new contracts.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 9 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    And eventually someone will spray graffiti really high up somehow

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 8 points 2 years ago

    Hell yeah, ominous hum!

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    What percentage needs to be cut for it to float in the air and shoot death rays at heretics?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›