all 10 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 0 points 9 months ago* (2 children)

Correct me if I’m wrong but those look like valid cases of actual terrorist orgs. Now if only this wasn’t limited to one ideology because I’m sure you’d find more right wing ones.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    “and an anti-fascist group whose members were prosecuted by German authorities for a hammer attack against neo-Nazis in Dresden.”

    Is that terrorism?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    I personally call that good workers activity

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

    Vigilantism is usually considered terrorism if done by a political org.

    [edit] Disclaimer: terrorism is okay sometimes because someone’s terrorist might be a somebody else’s freedom fighter - it all depends on the perspective. It’s just that if roles were reversed you’d be calling those nazis terrorists too and they’ll point out this as hypocrisy. Don’t give them ammo when you don’t need to.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago

    I guess it's valid to disagree with hitting Nazis with a hammer, but how is this supposed to be terrorism? The Nazis that got attacked tried several times to kill leftists by running them over with a car, that sound much more like terrorism to me.

  • source
  • parent