top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 65 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Hey black mirror had this where they had to watch an ad and looking away was illegal. We're getting there with Google and their recent and announced YouTube and Chrome changes.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 52 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    "Please drink verification can"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Jokes on them. I can be looking straight at something and still not be paying attention.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    That’s why you need a Neurolink so that they can make sure that you are thoughtfully considering each ad.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 41 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    "Picture yourself holding the product and smiling"

    "Now picture yourself recommending the product to friends and family."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    You know you’ve really made it as a meme when u/the_picard_maneuver posts you on lemmy. Love you bud hope you’re doing well x

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago

    Watching the ad instead of clicking it constitutes a violation of YouTube terms of service.

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Please drink verification can

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    You wouldn't steal a car, would you?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    You wouldn't steal a baby.
    You wouldn't shoot a policeman, and then steal his helmet.
    You wouldn't go to the toilet in his helmet.
    And then send it to the policeman's grieving widow...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Except that second button won't be there. There's something weird going on in our economy where the customers can't actually afford the products but somehow their attention/data is still valuable. I don't get it

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I honestly don't understand how advertisement is valued to highly.

    I have probably seen 1000hrs worth of ads by now and probably spent less than $1000 on the products advertised. But somehow if I want to avoid those ads I have to pay 10x that

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Especially on the internet it seems that the strategy is to beat you into submission, waterboarding you with branding until you aren't capable of doing anything other than buying their product.

    I get sick of seeing ads and then black list the company out of spite. And I do that brain surgery with a backhoe. Because of a certain marketing campaign for a Mission: Impossible movie, I'm never paying to see an action movie of any kind ever again. Because they annoyed me too much in 2015 or so. And because of Dr. Squatch, I think when I'm out of my current supply of Dial I'm going to start making my own soap.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    And here I am, completely ignoring YT and reading blogs, instead.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    I mean, it depends. Tutorials, for instance, when I need some info on something to fix, either physically or informatically (e.g., hosting and network stuff). Video format is utterly time expensive for this kind of stuff. I avoid it like the plague. For entertainment, I have a couple of subscriptions a la Netflix. I'm not interested at all in watching/listening "content creators".

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago
    [–] 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    Wait until they require a quiz be taken to prove you watched the video. They could also stitch together the video with the ads, so it's all a single video. They can make fast-forwarding videos impossible (to stop the sponsorblock stuff). Begun the Ad Wars have.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    This reminds me of the very real patent that exists for a television that requires you to stand up from your couch, raise your hands in the air, and shout the name of the product you just watched an ad for before it lets you return to watching your program.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 11 points 2 years ago

    Please click verification scam to continue

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago

    I just found this and I've been loving it, works really well.

    https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/

  • source
  • I'm really happy to see point #2 being mentioned. From their inception, Youtube established a social contract of providing their videos free to users without ads. I don't think Google should just be allowed to unilaterally change the contract on behalf of all parties and force it on everyone. If they had a good reason to do so, perhaps I would humor it, but "because of shithead shareholders" does not pass that bar.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago

    Drink verification can?

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago* (3 children)

    Excuse me, bitch, but how the fuck you know I went to piss? That's a violation of my privacy.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    I keep telling you YouTube I have a cloaca and I'm not sure what to call it when I go

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    No problem. Just use a proper ad blocker, and there will be no ads that you could use to go to the loo.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    Just wait til it uses the camera on your phone to track your eyes and will pause every time you look away.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago*

    In less than ten years this will be a "nottheonion" headline...

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    If technology exists they will 100% implement that ads will keep repeating unless there are people in the room. The active listening devices already record every data they can and it’s only a matter of time before they can accurately conclude if the room is empty or occupied.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    Honestly , can't wait for the future where companies like them are allowed to make adless entertainment illegal. It's going to be the absolute best future we could ever ask for. We should be thankful to our overlords for saving us from never having to see ads ever again. /s

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›