all 19 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 15 points 10 months ago (1 child)

Yay! I hope they figure out a way around the no-sideloading BS too

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    i would have thought it would be oneplus, but theyve recently made bootload unlocking more restrictive, unless theyre walking back on that for graphene

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Samsung phones are probably a no-go though, right? No way around their locked bootloader?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    The phone would be shipping with GrapheneOS, you don't need to unlock the bootloader if you are the OEM installing the OS.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago* (1 child)

    One of their comments mentions that having it preinstalled may or may not happen. The aim atm seems to be the current Pixel situation where you unlock the device and install it yourself.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    The project explained that only Pixels have met its strict security and update requirements so far.

    Have they explained before what these requirements are?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    I mean good for them for finally pulling their head outta their ass but this is again for rich people only. y'all who don't got no bricks of cash to spend on new & shiny slabs of glass - get fucked as usual.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments