cross-posted from: https://beehaw.org/post/6875734

People mentioned in this article are very old.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), 81 Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), 90 President Joe Biden, 80 Former President Donald Trump, 77

all 9 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 2 points 3 years ago

Our laws already exclude young people for nothing else than presumed inability, regardless of demonstrations of actual ability.

And yet we have no laws excluding the geriatric, even in cases of demonstrated inability.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    We need age and term limits to get these fossils out of office. I feel as though they're not capable of properly representing their electorate

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Exactly. What do 80+ year olds know about the needs of modern kids, teenagers, and young adults? Hell, many of them probably still think rent is like $50/month.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    That’s not even the biggest concern; they’re not at all invested in the future because they’re not a part of it. Why would they care about any of the consequences the choices/actions they make now that we’ll be dealing with 20 years from now?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago

    Politicians should be required to resign if they hit retirement age. We already require airline pilots to retire, why not the people leading the country as well

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago

    I think age limits are an option but are not really going after the root of the problem, nor are they a good solution. Our arguments that the elderly can't represent the youth can be made the other way just the same.

    One one end, the districts are too large, so you end up with the shit show we have. You don't end up with local communities voting on who reflects that community best. It squeezes out any opportunity for third parties.

    Secondly (Don't get attached to the people in this, the argument carries to any party/district), the democratic party will not allow AOC to run for Schumer's post. There's no supported way to ask the electorate if they would like a changing of the guard. Suggesting to primary someone who has been as successful as Schumer or McConnell would be political suicide. So you're stuck voting for Schumer/McConnell, even if you would prefer the youth candidate... in the NY example, Schumer still gets the votes and the party keeps supporting him. It's a blue seat and that matters more than getting "accurate" representation. I'd push for doing ranked choice primaries for all federal positions.

    TL;DR -- smaller districts. New parties. Encourage (or mandate?) primaries against incumbents.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago

    The same is true for Japan. Our leaders are completely out of touch, to the point that the minister tasked with Cybersecurity never even owned a smartphone. He'd been using an old flip phone.

    Apart from an age limit, term limits need to be installed for any position of power, whether that's political, economical or judicial functions. Worldwide.

    Humans are never to be trusted. Power corrupts.

  • source