all 33 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 53 points 2 years ago (3 children)

In GTA, at least in Vice City, if you shoot the moon with the sniper rifle, the moon changes size 👍

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    This works in real-life, too. Try it tonight!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    To the idiots that will try this, don't. There is a small chance your bullet will kill someone. It has to end up somewhere. No, it can not make it passed the Stratosphere... I mean.. bullet always come back down.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (2 children)

    Doesn't that depend on how much accelerant you use?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    What if my gun is a multi kilometre long railgun?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    You can also use a low gravity cheat, get into a rhino tank, turn the gun backwards and continuously shoot so the tank starts floating.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago

    In gta3, that was my favorite way to get between the islands after picking up misty. Then my older brother showed me where the banshee spawned and I never needed the tank again. Game sometimes got wonky and left the low gravity on for NPCs. Made cop chases a lot of fun

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 37 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I'm honestly curious why the moon looks bigger to the naked eye than my phone camera.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Your eyes have a huge field of vision, but a very small field of true observation. As you read this comment, you can acknowledge there's a whole paragraph of text, but can only read 3-6 letters at a time. So while you can notice things in a ~180 degree field of view, you're only analyzing 1/2 degree at a time. Coincidentally, the moon is about 1/2 degree in apparent size. Your thumb nail is also about the same size at arm's length.

    A camera, on the other hand, is taking a snapshot of an entire field of view. As you look through a photo, you're only analyzing the same 1/2 degree circle. If the photo is shrunk to fit, the moon is now much, much smaller than the original. If you zoom in on the pic to see the moon at the proper apparent size, you lose the other 99% of the picture - not unlike your actual useful view. Consider holding the phone up at arms length next to the moon as it shows the moon pic at life-scale. Your phone is effectively acting as a see through window - 6" wide and at arms length. See how little of the landscape is visible when actually scaled correctly? And even then, your phone is still about 15x wider than what your eyes can actually study at once. Hold your thumb out at arms length. Such a tiny amount of your field of view is obscured, yet it's probably slightly larger than whay you can observe.

    So ultimately, it's not about special effects, lens compression, wide angle distortion, or anything like that. It's all about having 2 very different formats for viewing the world without realizing the fundamental differences.

    PS: you may see people claim a 50mm lens on a full-frame camera is "what the human eye sees" regarding field of view. That's why it's used for portraits and favorable for some other close up photography. Yet, it's an awful combo for moon photography. It's field of view is about what people use to comfortably take in a whole object or scene. It will frame a portrait to about conversation distance and other objects to about where we would normally stand from an object of interest. Still, to observe it in detail, it needs to be displayed fairly large, like a whole computer screen. A 1080 phone at normal distance will look nice but won't quite match.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago*

    the real reason people say a 50 is "what your eye sees" is because of you put a 50mm lens on and look through the viewfinder on the camera there will be roughly no change in perspective. but yeah, this IS telephone compression, it's just that telephoto compression is also just about changing perspective. you can get the same effect by walking closer or further and cropping. though, you can't exactly walk any meaningful closer to the moon 😅. i really like the way you phrased the whole active focus vs whole field of view thing. I'm just being mildly pedantic.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    I’ve definitely felt the same effect looking at landscapes in person, versus reviewing the same photo on my phone later. Basically an obvious comparison to be made between watching a cinematic movie in a giant theater, versus on that small screen.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago

    Funny how lens compression gets magnified when the object is so far away it’s off planet 😂

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    I've never seen the moon so big!

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    If you look at the moon upside down like stand on your head or look through your legs it will look smaller

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • If you take a VR photo/video and watch it back in VR, the moon looks the same size as it was in real life.

  • source