Hard to imagine how they're going to take down deepfakes without limiting freedom of information or how they will prove who made the content.
post
Klobuchar will just use this as another rallying cry to tear down Section 230 and make the internet even worse. You can read it yourself, but earlier this year she tried to use a 19 year old ODing on fentanyl he bought off Snapchat as a reason to "... get rid of or reform section 230 ..."
Not sure how that's going to stop people from ODing on adulterated narcotics, but maybe supporting harm reduction and mental health services would be a better use of my tax payer money.
So where is this video? Genuine curiosity, I'd like to see how real it looks
It's this one, although I can't find the original, only the reaction to it.
I think this is a good thing. Now there's plausible deniability for anything you might have said in the past that surfaces - that's just a deepfake! Don't cancel me, it's not real.
Yes, what a good thing, the end of consequences and easily proven fact.
We've got a world "leader" who pioneered the end of consequences and showed that easily proven facts weren't worth the bits they were sent over the internet with, so that ship has already sailed.
Enjoy the freedom that comes with never having to answer for your crimes. Kick a puppy. Call someone a slur. Steal a game ball from a kid at the world series.
A president candidate in my country did that (allegedly). A video of him hard as a rock went public. A week later an "even worst" video was released that was obviously fabricated.
I mean... Yes, that is what deepfakes are. I am sorry it happened to poor old Amy, and I whish her vulgar, algorythmic doppelganger wouldn't have said awul things but... If this is news to you you might have not be paying attention for a while.
Are you sure it isn't fake?
all 23 comments