submitted 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) by to c/politics@lemmy.world
 

Vote No.

all 16 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 22 points 3 years ago (2 children)

This seems like it would make it harder for Ohioans to vote to make abortion and pot legal, against the wishes of the gerrymandered Republican legislature. I would vote no.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 years ago

    Vote No.

    1 person = 1 vote

    We need to prevent 40% of the population from being able to decide for the majority of Ohioans.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 3 years ago

    You’d have to be a fucking moron to vote Yes. I mean, like drinking bleach, shooting-self-in-foot stupid.

    So I expect “Yes” to have a frighteningly high turnout.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 3 years ago

    Voted early to get my NO vote in. Trying to get every neighbor, friend, and family member to do the same so this BS doesn't slip through on a special election.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    From Ohio, they seem to love cucking themselves so this is probably gonna pass.

    Please vote no, I can't think of a single advantage or positive outcome to raising the requirement to 60%.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago

    Any American that chooses less control over their government has dog turds for brains

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (4 children)

    Issue 1 = 60% vote to pass changes to the State's constitution. what is the % now?

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago

    Issue 1 = 60% vote to pass changes to the State's constitution

    Or another way to put it, Issue 1 = 40% vote to stop changes to the State's constitution.

    Why should 40% be able to control what goes through?

  • source
  • parent