all 39 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 25 points 3 years ago (2 children)

The 9to5 article is poorly written. In the first paragraph 9to5 says a new window system is "scheduled to replace" the current one, but this is not true. The cited blog post explicitly says "There’s no timeline or roadmap at this stage". The Gnome developers are merely experimenting with a new window management system and at this early stage it's impossible to know what the finished product may look like if these experiments go anywhere at all.

Here's a link to the original blog post where Gnome developer Tobias Bernard explains their dissatisfaction with existing window management systems and discusses the techinical challeneges developers face.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Looks like they have put a lot of thought into it so I'm keen to see where they get with it. My concern with these kind of changes is that they often end up trying to guess what the user wants, which creates an unpredictable behaviour that is then more annoying than it is helpful.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Exactly, for this community is to blame. People mostly are against even minimal and anonymous surveys, telemetry and stuff. So, all they can do is just assuming that people want something or not.

    Usually they are talking to active community members, whom, we all know that programmers and technical people.

    IMHO, they need a bit more data to decide on

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)

    And yet it seems to me only GNOME has this problem, and it has been there since Torvalds still publicly executing everyone in mailing list. XFCE, LXQT, hell, even KDE only has minimal complain about unexpected behavior. It seems to me that in a concerted effort to predict as much user behavior as possible, GNOME created this non existent "average user" that conforms to no one, and created this mess on their own.

    Also, we are mostly against nonconsensual, non-explicit, or opt-out type of feedback. As far as I concern, efforts to point out to GNOME devs their faults are many to the point its a meme. It is also, not unrelatedly, a meme that GNOME denies these complaints because "the average users wouldn't get it") . I think it should be clear enough by now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    You consent to their design choices by using the DM they are crafting.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Consent doesnt mean agree in this context tho. And it is debatable whether using is consenting. Do I consent to all the shady shit Microsoft was pulling when I install windows? (Looking at the number of debloaters and their received support from community, that seems like a no)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 years ago

    On one hand I'm interested in seeing how well it works and what they do with it, on the other hand...

    Source: https://xkcd.com/927/

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 3 years ago

    As long as they're using standard Wayland protocols like xdg_toplevel::set_max_size/::set_min_size, I'm sure the rest of the ecosystem will be on-board for this.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    I think this looks amazing. I do like the behaviour of tiling WMs, but having a DE is too comfy for me to give up. This could possibly bring the bestof both worlds.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    There are already ways to have tiling and a DE.

    On GNOME, there's PaperWM, although it's not quite traditional tiling either.

    On KDE Plasma 5.27+, you can use Polonium. For versions before 5.27, Bismuth.

    And on Xfce or LXQt, it's often possible to use them with a traditional tiling WM, like i3wm, bspwm etc..

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago

    I really can't stress how good PaperWM is in combination with a touchpad. I wouldn't recommend it at all on a mouse-only environment, but when you can use multitouch gestures to scroll through the workspace it works really well.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago

    I saw this and I really like that they are trying to improve it and innovate. Nothing has happened for a long time in the desktop innovation area since the web took over.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago

    Not really digging the dragging windows with the mouse bit. Hopefully will be workable with keyboard only.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I’ve been such a fan of the Pop_OS window tiling. By far the best implementation I’ve found

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)

    Agreed. It's the best blend of keyboard driven window management and recognizing that users might also use the mouse from time to time. I got my wife to use and default to tiling with Pop!_OS.

    The only problem is Pop!_OS is a shitshow of dependencies being built on Ubuntu. I had an update last night that reinstalled snapd and LibreOffice and Firefox even though I intentionally uninstalled them in favor of the flatpaks. Cosmic DE, and presumably re-basing Pop!_OS on nixOS (given a dev comment) can't come soon enough.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)

    There is no snap in pop os unless you installed... Firefox and libreoffice are debs. The problem may be that the pop-desktop package is depends on too many packages, but not snap

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago*

    Yet somehow, through only apt updates, it brought back LibreOffice, Firefox, and snapd.

    IIRC, it was something to do with ubuntu-minimal or ubuntu-release meta packages, which I never intentionaly installed.

    I'm probably the only person who uninstalls the Firefox and LibreOffice packages and replaces them with the flatpaks, but this seemed like an oversight and dependency hell that comes from using the derivative of a derivative distribution.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago

    At this point what I think Gnome should add is a Samsung-style touch friendly multitasking system. Stuff with touch dragable handles between apps

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago

    Innovations are pretty rare in the desktop space but this looks like a really good innovation if implemented bug free.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago* (1 child)

    I really enjoy how GNOME handles windows currently already.

    Between having the ability to move and resize windows with Super + (mouse left|right), switching between windows of the same application with Super + backtick, workspaces and Super + type to search, there is very little to desire.

    Unlike tiling VMs, this makes sense out of the box for 99% of the apps out there while providing a really quick way to get where you need quickly.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    We’re the little video clips not working for anyone else?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    Again? Wasn't Gnome3 bad enough?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] 3 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)
  • [–] -1 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Well, if you don't like customize it with using plugins that break every time that gnome gets an update, gnome 3 could be fine...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago

    Fun fact, most extensions don't even break, they just have a fixed value as a compatibile version... A popular example is, GS connect, it was marked as incompatible with gnome 44, but by editing the compatible version, it worked fine.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -4 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    That's a good one! Gnome is the Windows 8 of the Linux world, and the devs tend to intentionally break the extension system between major releases. It's truly baffling how the group that made Gnome 2.x continue to hate most of the Linux userbase so much.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments