post
What? You think young people are gonna vote for you for putting genocide protestors in prison? You are in for a disappointment.
UK really wanting a BrEnter vote
(BrExit, BrEnter)
If this reform doesn’t include proportional representation, then it isn’t a ‘major reform’
Folks, it's not about how smart/easy to manipulate they are. Your average adult voter is a pretty dumb shit too. We very specifically do not test for intelligence, education, critical thinking, knowledge, or anything else when people get the right to vote. Because none of that is the point. The point is that people have a say in how their government is formed and who runs it, regardless of their status. French peasants were pretty dumb too; were they wrong to seize the government from hereditary aristocrats? Ultimately, when classes of people don't have a say in how their government runs, they end up oppressed, and/or they find a different (usually violent) way to affect things. Give the damn teenagers a vote. It's not like they're worse than your average right-winger.
I feel like whatever rules there are for political campaigning to minors/in schools might need a bit of a revamp. Though as far as advertising goes I'm pretty sure the UK has sensible laws, especially for political advertising.
This is great, and overall something I'd support and want to see in my country (NZ).
My one criticism is that I've found that my friends at a young age just voted the same way as their family did. For a few reasons, such as to avoid upsetting dad, echo chambers or other things.
Not sure how to solve this one.
Ah yes those least impressionable and easily manipulated of us all- teenagers!
Look out; you’ve see what happened in the U.S. when we let MAGAts without fully formed brains vote.
Idk how I feel about that, I feel like at 16 I didn't understand anything about it well enough to make an informed decision but I sure as hell thought I did
I'm 53 and a lot of my peers are fucking stupid but allowed to vote. On a radio station here in the UK the main argument against was that they would be influenced by tiktok...
....as though people my age aren't influenced by fucking Facebook.
I mean they also have the perspective of having more of a need to be concerned with the distant future than those who are currently represented.
I had just turned 17 when the gay marriage plebiscite happened in Australia. I still remember the anger I felt at not being able to vote on my own right to marry.
I was more naive then than I am now, but I also was at twenty.
Many experts assert that a 16-year-old has sufficient cognitive and critical thinking capacities to make political decisions independently.xi Giving adolescents a voice and allowing their participation in matters that affect them through voting would also help fulfill a developmental need for agency and autonomy, which are core developmental tasks in adolescence.
You know John Adams once said that poor people, who didn't own property, and women shouldn't be allowed to vote because clearly they didn't know enough about politics and would just be advised and do whatever those with property said.
Well, I deal professionally with people involved in politics, as well as voters. I can assure you the average adult voter is just about as poorly informed as the average 16 year old, if not more so. At least a 16 year old will have had a recent lesson on politics and civics in general.
Frankly, there should be an actual test before you should be allowed to vote. Some people are so completely misinformed about the process that they do far more harm than good.
There are plenty of grown adults who know even less. I'm all for younger voting ages.
When I was 16 I’d have voted Conservative, so clearly I wasn’t informed either. Just cause you and I weren’t switched on to political and societal issues doesn’t mean many teens aren’t.
I would have thought that there were more serious issues to address.
Yes. Let's not do anything else at all until climate change is solved. Then we can start on habitat loss and do nothing else until that's solved, and then we can exclusively start to sort out microplastics before moving on to concentrating totally on water pollution. Oh hang on, climate change has started again. Better drop the work on pollution and go back to that. Hang on, kids, we'll be with you around the year 5832.
There are lots of things to fix in the world though climate change is pretty existential for everything. From what I can see, most people can’t cope with the broad expanse of all the issues. To expend political and social capital on issues that less pressing seems pretty much a waste.
Not what I said however if you spread yourself thin then nothing will happen.

all 48 comments